Civilization and living body. The fundamental consideration to the evolution theory.		The ture character of object for cognition.
		by Hiromasa Noguti.
	This again was revised again in November 6, 2011.
Old edition.		Introduction.
	The following reasonings about the society and organism and information first were started in the purpose that it finds the fundamental causes of social problems with thinking the relationship between information and evolution while paying attention to the common logic of society and organism. And, it could find out new viewpoint about evolution in that process. However, as it stated above, those reasonings were started from the social science interest in human society, not from the scientific interest. In spite of that, since it needed the viewpoint of biology in the process of thinking, it may have been natural that it found above-mentioned viewpoint. Today, the vast ship called the civilization is running with the horrific speed, asking for the higher civilized world. And, if it uses the figurative expression, by any chance, its speed looks to be about to go over the speed of light, soon. It can't but feel some fear. What kind of influence does the social keen change like that give us? For human being, what kind of existence would the civilization be? That was the first motive I had about the future reasonings. Therefore, as it stated before, evolution of organism and of information almost wasn't considered at first. However, the reasoning about civilization and community led me to the problems of the contradiction in between a individual or parts and the whole. That is, those are the contradictions existing between a individual and community. And, the contradictions like that seemed to be same at least at the logic as the contradiction in between a gene(or a cell or one organ) and organism. If so, it shouldn't lack the viewpoint of biology for the reasoning of the social contradiction like that. It is because it seemed those social contradictions are based on the fundamental logic inherent in organism. And, for this reasoning, it also needed the viewpoint of psychology because it seems that the inside and outside of the creature or of community is decided by the said observer's or its object's mental condition. So it started to think about human being and the society with the viewpoints like that after that. And, the reasoning in the viewpoints like that led me to certain understanding about the relation of inside and outside of a living body. Moreover, the understanding like that started to make the image of evolution I was vaguely thinking be obvious. That is the basic idea that evolution is a part of all the movement of Nature which includes the movement born of the relationship of creature and environment, and is the result born of the movement like that. This idea is stated by mathematical expression, and so on mainly at third knot and fourth knot. For the moment, it shows its equations next. As for the details, see third knot and fourth knot.   A1 = outside environment + inside environment(A2+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the formation of a living body.   A2 = outside environment + inside environment(A3+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the formation of a living body.   A(n-1) = outside environment + inside environment(An+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the formation of a living body. However, it thinks that it needs to read all knots if it tries to understand above-mentioned mathematical expression completely. It is because it seems that evolution of organism is the appearance of evolution of information which regulates the irreversible change of organism fundamentally. And, also the idea that a civilization is a kind of living body is necessary for thinking about civilization. Therefore, even if only organism and civilization are examined in detail, it would be hard to know the mechanism of evolution and the true characteristic of civilization. Then, the reasonings about living body which include society and civilization all would be stated from above-mentioned viewpoints. Therefore, those reasonings also may be different from the way of usual biology a little. Moreover, by any chance, there may be the poor explanations and the misunderstandings and so on because I am the outsider as for the biology. But, since it thinks the reasoning, the basic idea and logic are proper for the most part, please forgive it. In passing, those are based on the memorandum written in the 1998 year.
1: What kind of thing is creature?  2: An Individual and the society.   3: The vector of the change in a society.   4: The vector of the change of a living body. 5: Evolution and the political powers.   6: Political powers and social norms.   7: The two contradiction lurking to the creature world. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (1. Three logics 2. Biotechnology and creature's logic.) 8, Evolution and a civilization.   9: The logic inherent in civilization and ego.   10: The complementary explanation about the ego.  11: Evolution, information and a thinking. (1. Information and thinking. 2 Evolution of information related to the evolution theory. 3. Thinking and the cognition-subject. ) As for the 11th knot, it first was written in 2001 year.
Cotosiro Home for English