The physical world seen from the cognition-subject.(Characteristic time, Subjective time, and Objective time.).


	The origin of Japanese culture and, the world view as its logical conclusion.
	Hiromasa Noguti. Mail-address cotosiro@js6.so-net.ne.jp. September 13, 2003. This was renewed in March 28, 2004.
	Since it found out the serious error about the equation of the objective time, this was revised in January 15, 2005. But, it isn't that the recognition about the objective time was error since the ability for the explanation only was poor. It again revised the mistaken printing. Jan 18, 2005. This was revised a little in April 20, 2008. The old version
	6. The physical world seen from the cognition-subject. (Characteristic time, Subjective time, and Objective time.)
	First, it tentatively makes the following three dimensional graph about the space-time though the space-time originally has to be expressed by the four dimensional graph. The origin of the coordinate axes is the mathematical speck(present time) possessed by the cognition-subject. The vertical axis is the axis of the cognition-subject's characteristic time connecting the future and the past through the cognition-subject. Then, the space is expressed with the two dimensions(a surface) at right angles against the axis of time. Moreover, the two dimensions expressing the space are expressed by the X-axis and Y-axis which crosses at right angles against each. In passing, the X-axis and Y-axis each express the distance and direction at right angles against the axis of time. However, since in this case, the X-axis and Y-axis only are set up to show the position of the object on this graph, it isn't it is the position of the object in the space-time shown in four dimensional graph. Therefore, even if the direction shown by X-axis and Y-axis is different from the expression we use usually, it especially is no problem if above-mentioned condition is kept. By the way, if the above graph is seen, it notices that the cognition-person can perceive only the surface of the cone which spreads toward the past from the top which is the origin of coordinate axes. It is because the quickness of light is in the fixed condition under the vacuum condition. In passing, it is natural that the cognition-subject always is at the top of the cone. Then, the above mentioned perception means the cognition-person looks at the object directly. It never be the indirect perception from the books, pictures, and so on. Therefore, at least for him, it has to say all the part of the space-time exists as the possibility except the surface of the cone he is looking at. Even if a person relies on the others' memory about knowing the part unable to see directly, it is that it is impossible to trust the memory absolutely, because the verification for the memory only relies on the consistency in between the said person's memory and others' memory. Needless to say, the memory to be stated here includes not only the memory the said person has, but also other memory, for example, a book, a CD, and so on. Moreover, since the above graph only shows the position of the cognition-subject and the object at the space-time, as it stated before, the aspect shown there is different from the situation to be seen in so-called space-time. In other words, it is the characteristic space-time only the cognition-person always possessing the mathematical speck indicating this moment(the top of cone) can see. In passing, the cognition-person it states here means the individual person having perception or means individual spirit having perception. Therefore, the individual persons or other each have one's characteristic space-time. Then, all the mathematical specks in the surface of the cone each is perceived as the half arc if a person observes it in the so-called space-time. And, if the length of the half arc like that is set up as R, next inequality is found out. "0БГRБЕ infinity". (Since my computer hasn't the mathematical symbol of "infinity" in English font, it expressed it with "infinity". ) By the way, the angle of cone and the characteristic time are decided by the quickness of light. Therefore, the characteristic time like that concretely is calculated by the quickness of light and the distance between the cognition-person and the object emitting the light. And, if it explains it about the so-called space-time, it has to be calculated, with tracing the path of light emitted from the object. But, when it is calculated on the above graph, it is natural that the characteristic time is expressed by a straight line. Therefore, it can get the next equation. "CT = a L / c". In this case, the length of characteristic time is "CT", the constant is "a". The length between the cognition-person and the object is "L". And, the quickness of light is "c". Then, it sets up the following two variables, that is, the A and B to the next consideration. The "A" is the length calculated of the distance of when the cognition-person looks to have been carried through the axis of the time, to his present position(the top of the cone) from his position on the time axis in the moment where the said object gave off light. The "B" is the length of straight line drawn between the said object - in moment when it emitted light - and the cognition-person possessing the top of the cone. Needless to say, the distance between the cognition-person and the object is decided in the moment when light given off from that object arrived at him. So, it seems the value of the constant is 1 at the viewpoint of the beauty of the graph. Moreover, since it can't find out the reason that it has other value, as it thought, the value of constant would be 1. Therefore, in this case, the quickness of the cognition-person running toward the future through the axis of time is same as the quickness of light. It is because the A(length) is equal to the B(length) at the above graph if the value of above constant is 1. However, to tell the truth, the cognition-person in the above graph can't move from the present time. Therefore, it has to think the characteristic time and light each are running toward the converse direction against each with the same quickness. It is expressed by next equation. That is, it is "the quickness of the current of characteristic time"/b = -1 "the speed of light". In passing, the "b" is the constant. And, it seems this equation is very important for the perception. But, as for the thing, it is stated later. Anyhow, it can say the space-time shown by above graph is the characteristic space-time shown with the universal form of the perception for cognition-subject. And, it also expresses the fundamental form of the subjective space-time having the cognition-person on the center of the space-time. Therefore, it can't think it is the expression of the subjective world itself. Needless to say, the contents of the subjective world persistently are created by the relations between the cognition-subject and its targets and by the ability and form of perception the cognition-person has. However, the above graph expresses not only the subjective space-time but also objective space-time. As for the thing, it is stated after the consideration of the subjective space-time. By the way, the quickness of the current of the time in the subjective space-time is decided by the relationship between the cognition-person and the amount of information he accepts. In other words, the subjective time shifts to the shorter condition if the amount of information perceived by the cognition-person decreases. Then, if conversely, the amount like that increases, the subjective time shifts to the longer condition. And, the information like that is the stimulus the cognition-person perceives as the information, is the stimulus emitted from the outside world as the undulation. Moreover, the subjective perception like that relies on the characteristic space-time fundamentally. Therefore, the subjective time also has to be based on the characteristic time. If so, it can suppose the next equation. That is, it is "ST = CT Ifm". In this case, the "ST" is the length of subjective time. The "Ifm" is the amount of information. As for the "Ifm", it is restricted by the next inequality. That is, it is "0 < Ifm < 1". As it stated before, the illogical existence, with illogically jumping to the logical existence(the cognition-subject and the object), is given the conceptualization called the distinction. So, space-time is created. It is because the illogical world includes the logical world. At any rate, the cognition-subject is distinguished from whole of the object first when the space-time is given the birth. That is, one cognition-subject and the world to be one object appear first. All the stimuluses emitted from the space-time are only the expression of whole of the object like that. Therefore, it thought that the "Imf" has to be expressed by fraction. Needless to say, the Imf is the amount of the information the object gives off, is not the amount of the object. In other words, it is the amount of information the cognition-person perceives. In passing, the object like that always is in the surface of the cone. And, as the distance between the cognition-person and its object becomes longer, the stimulus the cognition-person accepts from the object decreases. By the way, It can get the "ST = L/c Imf" if it substitutes the right side of the "CT = L/c" to the above equation. And, if the "Imf" is very close to 0(1/infinity), the length of subjective time is "1/infinity" when it calculates the "ST = L/c Imf". In other words, the quickness of the current of the time is infinity. (The "L" is finite). And, the object quicker than light doesn't exist in the material world. If so, it seems this has to be applied to the current of the time at the above graph as well. In other words, the quickness of the current of the time can't be faster than the quickness of light in at least the material world. If so, above calculations mean that the cognition-person disappears, flying away from the material world. That is, it seems it means at least the physical death. However, about the thing, would the above graph show the aspect of the objective time how? Next, it thinks that problem. The length of objective time changes, corresponding to the physical relations in between the observer and the object though it is natural that it is based on the characteristic time. Therefore, it can suppose "OT = Gn/c", with replacing the "L" with the "Gn" at the equation of the objective time. In this case, the "OT" is the length of objective time. The "Gn" is the value gotten from the curvature of space-time. Hereupon, it can suppose the next inequality about the "Gn". That is, it is the "infinity> Gn > 1/infinity". And, at that time, the "Gn" can get the value bigger than the "L" or the value of the "L", corresponding to the circumstances if it is seen logically. It is because the "length between the cognition-person and the object" in the objective space-time can't be shorter than the "L". Probably, the above mentioned inequality relates to the fact that the space-time had the size at the beginning of the big bang. Even if the cognition-subject and its object be at the beginning of big bang, it seems they appear in the same time as the birth of space-time. If so, it is that it is natural that the perceived space-time has the size because light has the finite quickness. It deletes the part put in next parentheses in my circumstance. (Therefore, if the inequality about the Gn is proper, It can suppose "Gn = 1/ b/ Ep". In this case, the "b" is the constant. The "Ep" expresses the length of the curved line(the path of light between the cognition subject and the object) calculated by the curvature of the space on the so-called space-time. Then, the value of the "Ep" has to be restricted by next inequality. "1/БЗ < Ep < БЗ". So, the "Gn" is the reciprocal of the"b Ep".) In passing, the curvature "Cur" is restricted in the next inequality. "1> Cur > 1/БЗ". By the way, if the "Gn" is the infinity in the above equation, the "OT" also is infinity. It is that at that time, it can think the length of objective time be limitlessly long. In other words, it can think the current of objective time is limitlessly slow. And, since at that time, it seems the space-time almost is the mathematical speck, it seems this condition is the beginning of the big bang. Conversely, if the value of "Gn" is same as the "L" of the equation expressing the characteristic time, the length of objective time is same as the length of characteristic time. In other words, the distance between the cognition-person and its object is the "L". However, it seems it is the empty world not making anything exist even if god sees it. It is because it means the energy doesn't exist that the "L" is straight. But, the objective space-time like that can't exist absolutely. It really is the death of the space-time. And, if the above consideration is proper, it can suppose next inequality. "c > (the quickness of the current of the objective time)> 0". Needless to say, it is because it is supposed the current of the time is slower than the quickness of light because a cognition-person looks to run toward the future. On the other hand, this inequality also is applied to the quickness of subjective time's current as well. And, as it stated before, it seems the cognition-subject goes away from the space-time if the quickness of the current of the subjective time becomes close to the quickness of light limitlessly. It tallies with the death of objective space-time entirely. Therefore, at least for one cognition-person, it seems his physical death also is the death of space-time. Anyhow, if this consideration is proper, as it thought, the subjective world and the objective world both are based on the relationship between the cognition-person and the objects. And, the value of the "Gn" and the value of the "Imf", if each equation of time is compared with each, are in the relationship of the inverse proportion at each inequality. Needless to say, as for the amount and contents of "Imf", it is natural that it is related to the form and ability of the perception. By the way, as it stated before, it is certain the next equation is proper. "the quickness of the current of characteristic time"/b = -1 "the speed of light". Needless to say, it is because it apparently seems the time comes toward the cognition-person in the converse direction against light. In other words, light comes from the past. And, time comes from the future. It makes me recall the relationship of the electric current and the current of electron. The time and light each may be the concepts expressing individually two aspect of the same thing.

NEXT PAGE		Empedokles who was philosopher at the ancient Greece says the perception is given when the particle of something emitted from the eyes arrives at the substance. Apparently, it seems it is the terrible mistake. But, I understood this particle to be the will emitted for perception from the spiritual world. And, not until the will like that is emitted, it can think it makes the object(Kan-musubi) and subject(Takami-musubi) materialize at this world for the conceptualization and the phenomenon. If so, it is possible to suppose the time and light which originally are the same existence are the first expression of logic providing the relationship of the cognition-person and the object. So, it seems the logic like that is shown us with the next equation. That is, that is the "quickness of the current of the characteristic time"/b = -1 "the speed of light".
	Anyhow, the mathematical speck possessed by the cognition-subject always is the center of the space-time, is always the present moment. And, it seems it is the only place to create his perception and universe. I named the place the singular point of perception. The pages about Kan-musubi and Takami-musubi. 3-2. The divine nature of the gods of the especial heavens side(Koto-ama-tu-kami). 5. The subject and object which are seen into the relation of Kan-musubi and Takami-musubi.
Cotosiro