The origin of Japanese culture, and, the world view as its logical conclusion.
	Hiromasa Noguti. Mail-address cotosiro@js6.so-net.ne.jp. September 13, 2003. This was renewed in March 28, 2004.
	6. The physical world seen from the cognition-subject. (Characteristic time, Subjective time, and Objective time.)
	First, it makes the following three dimensional graph about the space-time though the space-time originally has to be expressed in the four dimensional graph. The origin of the coordinate is the mathematical speck(present time) possessed by the cognition-subject. And, the vertical axis is the axis of his characteristic time which is connecting the future and the past through the cognition-subject. Then, the space is expressed as the two dimensions which crosses at right angles against the axis of time. Moreover, the two dimensions expressing space are expressed by the X-axis and Y-axis which crosses at right angles against each. In passing, the X-axis and Y-axis each express the direction and the distance which are shown against the axis of time. However, in this case, the X-axis and Y-axis only is set up for the moment to show the position of object. Therefore, even if it is decided in the different expression from the usual expression for direction of the actual space, it especially is no problem if above-mentioned condition is kept. By the way, if the above graph is seen, it can know that the cognition-subject can see only the surface of the cone which spreads toward the past from the top which is origin of coordinate. It is because the light has the fixed quickness under the vacuum condition. Then, since the perception in this case is meaning that the cognition-subject looks directly, it isn't the indirect recognition from the books, pictures, and so on. Therefore, at least for cognition-subject, it has to be said that all part of the space-time except such surface which is seen by him exists as the possibility. It is because the memory seems to be unable to get the absolute trust since the verification of one memory only is based to the consistency which is between the said memory and other memory. In passing, such memory in this case includes not only the said person's memory, but also other's memory and books, and so on. Moreover, since the above graph only shows the relation about the position of the cognition-subject and the object in the space-time, it is different from so-called space-time. In other words, it is the characteristic space-time seen from the cognition-subject possessing the mathematical speck which always is the present time. Then, the mathematical specks in the surface of the cone are expressed as the half arc if it is said about the so-called space-time. And, if the length of the half arc is set up as R, next inequality is found out. . By the way, the angle of cone and the characteristic time are provided by the quickness of light. Therefore, such characteristic time concretely is calculated by the quickness of light and the distance between the cognition-subject and the object emitting the light. And, if it is said about the so-called space-time, it has to be calculated, with tracing the path of light emitted from the object. Of course, at that time, in the case of characteristic space-time, such length is calculated in straight line. Therefore, it can get the next equation. "CT = a L / c". In this case, the characteristic time is "CT", the constant is "a". And, the length between the cognition-subject and the object is "L". Moreover, the quickness of light is "c". And, this constant's value seems to be one if it is seen from the viewpoint of the beauty of graph. Moreover, since it can't find out the reason that it is other value, as it thought, the value of constant seems to be 1. Therefore, in this case, the cognition-subject's quickness running toward the future through the axis of time is same as the quickness of light. It is because A(length) is equal to B(length) at the above graph if the value of above constant is 1. In passing, the "B" is the length of straight line drawn upon the cone between the object and the cognition-subject possessing the origin of coordinate. But, it has to be the length of the moment where the light emitted from the object arrived to him. And, the "A" is the migration length of the cognition-subject seeming to have been carried through the axis of the time, to the present position from his position on the time axis of the time where the said object emitted the light. However, the cognition-subject in the above graph can't move from the present time. Therefore, it has to be said that the characteristic time and the light is running toward the converse direction against each with the same quickness. In other words, it is expressed by next equation. That is, it is "the quickness of characteristic time's current" = - 1 "the speed of light". And, this equation seems to be very important for the perception. But, as for the thing, it is stated later. At any rate, the space-time shown by above graph is the characteristic space-time which is based on the universal form of the perception for all the cognition-subject, and it also is the basic form of subjective space-time which puts the cognition-subject on the center of such space-time. Therefore, it can't be said to be subjective world at once. The contents of subjective world persistently are created by the relation between the cognition-subject and its targets and by the form and ability of recognition of the cognition-subject. And, the characteristic time is related not only to the subjective space-time but also to the objective space-time. However, as for the thing, it is stated after next consideration to the subjective space-time finished. So, the quickness of the time's current in the subjective space-time is decided by the relationship between the cognition-subject and the amount of information. In other words, the subjective time becomes shorter if the amount of information perceived by the cognition-subject is a few. Then, if conversely, such amount increases, the subjective time becomes longer. And, such information is the stimulus perceived by the cognition-subject, is the stimulus emitted from the outside world as the undulation. Moreover, such subjective recognition is based on the characteristic space-time. Therefore, the subjective time also has to be based on the characteristic time. If so, next equation is supposed. That is, it is "ST = CT Ifm". In passing, the "ST" is subjective time, and the "Ifm" is the amount of information. However, as for the value of "Ifm", it is restricted by the next inequality. . As it was stated before, it seems that all space-times are given the birth because the illogical existence, with illogically jumping to the logical existence(subject and object), is given the conceptualization called the distinction. As it was stated many times, it is because the illogical world includes the logical world. At any rate, the subject and object are the existence able to be counted first when the space-time is given the birth. That is, they are one subject and one object. All the stimulus emitted from the space-time is only the expression of such object. Therefore, it thought that the "Imf" has to be expressed by fraction. By the way, It can get the "ST = L/c Imf" if it substitutes the right side of the "CT = L/c" to the above equation. And, if the "Imf" is very close to 0, the length of subjective time can be said to be "1/infinite length" when it calculates the "ST = L/c Imf". In other words, the quickness of time's current is infinite. (The "L" is finite). And, since the object quicker than the light doesn't exist in the physical world, it seems that the thing can be applied to the time's current as well if the idea of the characteristic space-time is proper. In other words, the quickness of time's current can't become faster than the quickness of the light in at least the physical world. If so, the result in above calculations seems to be meaning that the cognition-subject, flying away from the physical world, disappears. That is, it seems to be meaning at least the physical death. If so, as for the objective space-time, would it show what kind of aspect ? Next, it thinks about the thing. The length of objective time is changed, corresponding to the physical relationship, and so on of the observer and the object though it is natural that it is based on the characteristic time. Therefore, "OT = L Gn/c" is supposed. In this case, the "OT" expresses the objective time, and, the "Gn" is the value gotten from the curvature of space-time. Just then, next inequality is supposed about the "Gn". . It is because the "length between the cognition-subject and the object" in the objective space-time can't become shorter than the "L", though it is possible that it is infinite mathematically. Probably, the above mentioned inequality seems to relate to the fact that the space-time had the size at the first of the big bang. Even if the cognition-subject and its targets are in the first of big bang, since they seem to appear in the same time as the birth of space-time, it would be natural that the perceived space-time has the size because the light has the finite quickness. Therefore, if the inequality of the Gn is proper, the "Gn" is expressed as "Gn = b Cur Ep". In passing, the "b" is the constant, and the "Cur" is the value of curvature of space-time. And, if so, the value of the "Ep" has to be restricted by next inequality. . Therefore, the "Ep" seems to express the expansion of the space-time. And, this smallest value, expressed as 1, is the first size of perceived space-time by the subject when big bang happened. Therefore, "OT = L Gn/c" can be rewritten to "OT = L b Cur Ep/c". But, the constant still isn't known quantity. In passing, it is natural that the "Cur" is restricted to next inequality. . By the way, in the above equation, if the "Gn" is infinite, the "OT" is infinite. In other words, the length of objective time becomes long limitlessly. And, at that time, since the space-time seems to be the mathematical speck, this condition seems to be the beginning of the big bang. Conversely, if the value of "Gn" is 1, the length of objective time becomes the same as the length of characteristic time. And, it seems to be meaning that the distance between the cognition-subject and the object is the "L". However, it seems to be meaning the empty world which doesn't make anything exist even if it is seen from every observer. Since the "L" is straight, it is because it is meaning that the energy doesn't exist. But, such objective space-time can't exist absolutely. In other words, it is the death of the space-time. And, if the above consideration is proper, next inequality is established. That is, it is "c > (the quickness of objective time's current) > 0". On the other hand, such inequality also is applied to the quickness of subjective time's current as well. And, as it was stated before, the cognition-subject seems to go away from the space-time if the quickness of subjective time's current becomes close to the light's quickness limitlessly. Furthermore, it tallies with the death of objective space-time entirely. Therefore, at least for one cognition-subject, it would be that his physical death is the death of space-time. At any rate, if the consideration done until now is proper, as it thought, the subjective world and the objective world both are based on the relationship between the cognition-subject and its targets. And, the value of the "Gn" and the value of the "Imf", if each equation of time is compared, are in the relationship of the inverse proportion as each inequality. Of course, as for the amount and contents of "Imf", it is natural that it is related to the form of recognition and also to the ability. By the way, as it was stated before, the "quickness of characteristic time's current" is "-1 speed of light". Needless to say, it is because it apparently seems that the time runs toward the cognition-subject to the converse direction of movement of the light. This thing makes me recall the relationship of the electric current and the current of electron. In other words, the time and the light each may be the concept expressing individually the two aspect of the existence which originally is the same.
NEXT PAGE			It is said that the perception is given when the particle of something emitted from the eyes arrives to the object, according to Empedokles who is the ancient Greek philosopher. Apparently, it seems to be the terrible error. But, I understood this particle to be the intention of the perception from the spiritual world. And, not until such intention is emitted, it seems that it makes the object(Kan-musubi) and subject(Takami-musubi) materialize to this world for the conceptualization and the phenomenon. If so, it is possible to think that the time and light which seem to originally be the same existence are the first expression of logic providing the relationship of such object and subject. And, such logic seems to be shown us as the "quickness of characteristic time's current" = "- 1 speed of light".
	At any rate, the mathematical speck possessed by the cognition-subject always is the center of the space-time, is always the present time, and seems to be the only place to create his recognition and universe. I named such place the singular point of perception. The pages about Kan-musubi and Takami-musubi. 3-2. The divine nature of the gods of the especial heavens side(Koto-ama-tu-kami). 5. The subject and object which are seen into the relation of Kan-musubi and Takami-musubi.
Cotosiro