Civilization and living body. A fundamental consideration to the evolution theory.
		by Hiromasa Noguti.
	This at first was written in Japanese in 1998 year. (http://www2.justnet.ne.jp/~cotosiro/sinka1.htm or others.)Then, it was translated into English in February 2000. (http://www2.justnet.ne.jp/~cotosiro/with0.htm or others.) However, since it was the unsatisfactory performance, it was rewritten many times. October 10, 2003. This again was rewritten a little in February 13, 2005.
		The vector of the change in a living body.
	It expressed the change of a social structure with the simple equation in former knot. As a matter of fact, it can apply that equation to the change in the structure of the various living body. In other words, it can substitute each concept in an individual, a society, and a colony and so on for the left side in the equation mentioned above. Of course, it doesn't mean that the values of those substituted concepts are equal. However, it seems that the concepts to be substituted like that include even an ecosystem to say the least. But, as you see, when that equation is given, the concept for the members in the right side are fixed for the concept of society set in the left side. In other words, the fixed members like that never be suitable for the future consideration. So, it was replaced as follows because the concept of living body includes not only a organism but also a society, colony or other. The formation of the living body(the vector of the change)= a outside environment + a inside environment + a hereditary factor administering the form of a living body. Of course, the living body in the left side and each member of the right side are the change member in this case. In passing, as for the change member, it doesn't mean a variable. It means the blank able to be substituted in the selected concept persistently. But, it is natural that the concrete concept to be substituted for the change member is handled as the variable for the vector. Then, the following concrete concepts are substituted for these change members, corresponding to the theme. Those concepts are, that is, the certain individual, the certain colony, the certain society, the certain species, the certain ecosystem, and the certain natural environment, and so on. Then, if the concrete concept to be substituted for the left side is decided, each concrete concept corresponding to the concept substituted for the left side is substituted for each change member of right side. Of course, in this case, the natural environment selected as the concrete concept always is substituted to the outside environment of change member in the right side without the consideration to the concrete concept of the left side. But, it is natural that the contents of the concepts like that are different, corresponding to the concrete concept substituted for the left side. In other words, the contents of the ecosystem and society, individual, and "the hereditary factor administering the form of a living body", and so on each are decided concretely corresponding to the concrete concept substituted for the left side. And, they are substituted like that for the change-member in the right side. Therefore, if it substitutes the characteristic form and quality as a concrete concept for the outside environment of the right side, it is natural that it has to substitute the social environment as the concrete concept for outside environment of change member as well. In passing, in this case, the concrete concept to be substituted for the left side is a gene, a cell, and so on. And, in the same process, each concrete concept to be substituted for the inside environment and "the hereditary factor administering form of a living body", and so on is decided as well. Therefore, usually, many concrete concepts are substituted for the same change member at the same time. In other words, each vector shown by those concrete concepts is added as the vector of the said change member. For example, the following factors are taken to the inside environment of the right side when an ecosystem is put in the left side of the equation. That is, those are a genetic trait factor, a social environment, and so on, and are the environments and so on to be kept by the ecosystem at that time as well. If so, it has to think the concrete concept going into the left side also exists also to the right side. In other words, each member of the right side has the numerical formula of the right side. Its aspect is really fractal. So, the aspect like that appears as the layer structure of the concrete concept at this equation. Thereupon, suppose that the concrete concept to be substituted for the change member in the left side is the social form. And, its vector is expressed as A1. Just then, the above equation becomes the following equation. A1= outside environment + inside environment + a hereditary factor administering the form of a living body. So, if it tries to calculate about the right side at that time, it would notice the vector (A2) of change in the social form exists into the member of the inside environment. In other words, it can say the vector of the same concept like that appears on the member of the inside environment hierarchically as follows. A1 = outside environment + inside environment(A2+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the form of a living body. A2 = outside environment + inside environment(A3+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the form of a living body. ||||| A (n-1) = outside environment + inside environment(An+other factors)+ a hereditary factor administering the form of a living body. In passing, the number appended to the "A" expresses the turn of the time. Therefore, in this case, the "A1" is the newest vector. If so, it seems the left side of those equations all can express the vector of the change of form of the living body until reaching to at least the level of the genetic factor. In other words, if the concrete concept for "the hereditary factor administering the form of a living body" is substituted to the left side, as it was mentioned above, it makes the layer structure in the numerical formula of the right side as well. And, in this case, the left side means the change in the genetic trait. As a matter of fact, that is deeply related to evolution. It is because evolution is one of the changes in the genetic trait. In other words, it can think evolution occurs when the vector of the change in the genetic trait indicates the same irreversible course in the whole of the species or one colony. Thereupon, if it observes this chain of the equations, it seems the vector of the change in the genetic trait shows the tendency to keep the certain vector, in the same period, in the same area, and in the same species. Then, it doesn't seem that the change in the genetic trait like that functions so disadvantageously for the said organism if the violent change in the environment doesn't happen. It is because the hereditary factor administering the form of a organism acts to also the genetic factor itself if the equation mentioned before is considered. In other words, it seems the variants of the genetic factor are led to the cooperative relationship among the genetic factors in some way considerably. Probably, it seems the thing also applies to the genetic factor coming into the organism from the outside world as well. Conversely, if one genetic factor gives the said organism the harm, it can think the function to give the harm like that is controlled to the certain extent in same reason. In other words, since there is the mechanism like that, it seems evolution occurs. Moreover, if it observes the chain of equations, it seems the vector of the change is in the controled condition in the fluctuation of the narrow extent in the given period if it gets the certain value once. For example, the hourse's toes kept decreasing in the certain period and probably at the certain area, and became the hoof. Or else, as for the mammoth, his tusks kept becoming longer than before at the certain circumstances. In other words, it seems that the change in the genetic trait as the species brings the evolution like the straight frequently. It is because it is unacceptable each vector of the members of the right side is changed irregularly at the short period if it observes the chain of the equations. In other words, it seems the vector for evolution doesn't change so easily if it gets the certain value once. However, if it observes the members of the right side carefully, the scale of the time at the change of vector may be different, corresponding to each member though it still can't show definite evidence. At any rate, it can think that the relations shown by the above equations are the actual aspect of evolution. If so, even if the certain virus lengthened the neck of giraffe, it seems that the other members in the above equations influence the thing deeply. In other words, it can think that evolution like that is the result that the vectors of each member were added up. It would be that the certain genetic factor brought by the virus was changed or made to activate for lengthening the neck of giraffe by other factors. Certainly, it seems the infection of the virus is the direct cause in this case. But, the direct cause like that never be a necessary and sufficient condition for at least evolution. At any rate, if the above reasoning is proper, it reaches to the conclusion like that. By the way, there is the certain thing which was forgotten of saying. It is the recognition to have about the standstill of the change in the genetic trait. That is, that is the recognition that the standstill like that is one form of the change. And, in this case, the vector like that makes the said object keep one's characteristic form and quality or one's physical condition. If so, it seems the certain vector shuts life. If it reasons the thing about a human being, it seems it can understand the thing easily especially now. And, in connection with the thing, would the human society be in what kind of vector now ? Today, this problem catches the mind very much when it considers the terrible change of the environment. But, it seems it isn't so easy it finds out the answer. Or, would it be that only gods know it ?
3rd knot. NEXT PAGE
cotosiro