Relationship between the black hole and me.
	This was written in Japanese in 29th March, 2000 to the homepage of Justnet and also was translated to English soon. This English edition, revised, was issued in Nifty in December 13, 2003. But, since it was the unsatisfactory performance, it was rewritten a little in April 18, 2004 and in February 2005.
Subjective time and characteristic time and photon.
			"Kouin ya nho gotosi". This means "Time flies like an arrow" in Japanese. This is the idiom everybody knows if it is Japanese people. By the way, I found the relationship between a black hole and me from this idiom recently. As a matter of fact, since it seemed this relationship is very serious for me, it kept on looking for it many years. And, it is that it could find out it narrowly at last. Therefore, it is difficult it explains that relationship in the simple words. Before it explains that relationship, it has to state the relationship between the feeling to the length of time and the speed of light, that is, photon. Therefore, please have the patience a little to listen because it is easy if it could understand though just a little troublesome. Note : The "kouin" means a light, and, the "ya" means an arrow. The "nho" is the postpositional particle used in usage like the "of" in this case. And, the "gotosi" is used in usage like the "like" in this case. However, it calls light the "hikari" in Japanese generally. Since the "kouin" is written like the "light-shade" in the Chinese characters, to tell the truth, the "kouin" is different from light a little if it says strictly. It seems it rather is better to say it expresses the trace of light. It is because the "kouin" often expresses the image in which the times pass, while leaving the phenomenon.
1, Time and the feeling to time.
	At least as for a person, it feel the length of time becomes shorter increasingly than before, as one's age is grown. You also would be caught to the impression like that as well if your one past occurs to oneself, flashing across the mind suddenly. However, why would it be so ? Probably, it would be because it come to be dull of the stimuluses of outside world, as time goes on if it says it in psychology-like interpretation. In other words, it seems it feels the impression like that because it reacts automatically with a little consciousness, accustomed to the stimuluses like that after all. We, when receiving one stimulus, necessarily are caught to the former understanding about the stimulus like that. It would be we are apt to not try to think of the stimulus like that again since then. Therefore, we lose the curiosity about the outside world like that gradually. And, in that reason, the new discoveries almost aren't brought to him.
	However if it says about the infants, conversely, the new discoveries, appearing one after another, catch them. Therefore, there almost isn't the chance they look back on the past. In other words, it seems the density of the subjective time in a infant is considerably deeper than a adult if the objective time is adopted as the standard. It is because the happening to catch the consciousness appears without a break. The subjective time is measured in the density like that. Therefore, it is natural that the subjective time of adult is shorter than children.
	However, would the difference of subjective time like that occur in only the mental factors ? As for me, it doesn't seem it is so. It seems the subjective time is related to not only the mental factors but also the law of nature though needless to say, the subjective time isn't the so-called physical time, that is, objective time. But, it states the details later.
			By the way, it is said the objective time hasn't the absolute length, according to the theory of relativity Dr. Einstein stated. And, he says the time about the object in motion becomes longer than before as the object's speed becomes close to the speed of photon. If so, if the person is riding the spaceship flying in the speed close to the quickness of photon, would it be possible he lives for example for more than two hundred years ? To all appearances, it doesn't seem it is so. Even if he lives long in the spaceship, his life span for him would be for about one hundred years at most. However, when he returned to the earth, the passing times like that may be for five hundred years or for one thousand years if it is measured with the time of the earth. But, he wouldn't hold the actual feeling like that. If it guesses his actual feeling, it seems it is for about 100 years probably.
	By the way, there is one question here. Which time would his time be in this case ? Of course, as you saw through, until he comes down to the earth, it seems his time is same as the time of the spaceship. And, when the spaceship begins to approach to the earth with making the speed slow gradually, it seems his time becomes gradually close to the time of the earth. Then, at a moment where he arrives at the earth, it seems his time becomes almost same as the time of the earth. However, to tell the truth, his time is nothing else but to be his time. In other words, it is that the former statements were only stated from the viewpoint of other observer, not from the viewpoint of him. When he perceives something, he exists as the cognition-subject persistently. However, wouldn't many people be forgetting the thing ?
	At any rate, it can say the time for himself is measured with his characteristic time persistently. And, the thing makes me feel the certain relationship between the subjective time and objective time, though it still isn't so clear. The thing would become clear as it does the reasoning about time. But, for the moment, it seems it could understand the character of the time a little. How do you think about it ? At any rate, it seems the time has the same characteristic as the photon. However, it states its details in the following short knot.
2, Time and photon.
	It showed in the above consideration the time like that for the object(someone or something) in motion is measured with the characteristic time of itself. In other words, it can't say it is the time for himself or itself if it is measured with the time of other objects in motion. And, it seems there is the point in common between the characteristic time and the quickness of photon if it sees it from the certain viewpoint. Usually the speed of the object in motion can't have the absolute value because it correlates with the movement of other objects. In other words, the characteristic speed of the object in motion doesn't exist. However, as for photon, it has the different nature at the meaning like that. The photon runs in the fixed quickness toward any object in motion. Therefore, an observer on the earth can see the spaceship going away from the earth with the speed close to photon. In other words, even if it considers the theory of relativity, it seems that the characteristic time of the object in motion and the quickness of the photon are the absolute standard in principle.
			It seems this is important very much for the future reasoning. It is because it seem those correlate with the various perception directly. Even if it is the perception of the physical phenomenon, it seems it is the personal perception before being the objective perception. In other words, it can say it is subjective perception originally. By the way, the human ego keeps on advancing toward the future from the present position through the space-time. Or else, it seems it can say the time passes toward the past from the future through the human ego. At any rate, it seems this is very similar to the relationship between the electric current and the current of electron. Therefore, since it can think the time like that is based on the speed of the photon which is at vacuum, it has to measure the characteristic time of the cognition-subject in the length of the straight line drawn between him and past illuminants.
	It is because the photon arriving at him brings the information on the moment of the certain past. (In this case, as for a vector of the photon, it is directed to his ego.). Therefore, it has to think that the photon is running toward the opposite direction against the current of time toward present point of cognition-subject if it says it about the space-time. If it compares it with the relationship between the current of electron and the electric current it is possible it understand as follows as it stated before. That is, the time corresponds to the electron. And, the photon corresponds to the electric current probably. Therefore, it can understand the time and the photon as each aspect which appears from the certain existence. I hope the existence like that is perceived clearly though it seems the existence like that is the mental footing for the cognition-subject. At any rate, it seems the cognition-subject is always in the position where the time collides against the photon. If it sees it from the converse viewpoint, it would be that the collision like that causes the perception. Then, since the speed of the photon to measure characteristic time is changeless, it seems the quickness of current of characteristic time also is changeless. However, by any chance, there may be a person to point about the time lag where the information from the past is transmitted with the neural systems. But, it seems the suggestion like that is meaningless at all in this case because it is that it dared to state the characteristic time in its physical impression from the standpoint of the cognition-subject who is the mathematical speck.
	By the way, we can't see the self of old times directly. But, it apparently seems it can see the self of old times in some way if the photon comes from the past. However, since I haven't the experience like that at all, as it thought, it seems it is impossible in reality. Why would it be so ? The reason is easy. If someone wants to look at the self of old times, he has to go to the future earlier than the photon. Then, he, making his characteristic speed slower, has to be waiting until the photon from the past arrives at him. However, every object can't move faster than the photon and also can't change the quickness of current of his characteristic time. Therefore, it is that it is impossible it sees the self of old times even if it is the gods and goddesses if it exists in this world as the physical existence. But, in this case, the self reflected to the mirror is excepted because it is the indirect perception gotten through the mirror same as the photo.
			The characteristic speed of person to advance to the future is changeless persistently because the quickness of current in his characteristic time is changeless same as the quickness of the photon. In other words, it can say the cognition-subject always to be in the present speck can perceive directly the object in space-time able to keep the speed of the photon as the constant. If not, it seems that the consistency between the recognition and space-time collapses. In passing, in this case, the recognition gotten from the existent relic, the books, and so on is understood as the indirect perception. In other words, it can think the space-time is in the covered situation by the transparent umbrella not having the thickness toward the past from the position of cognition-subject(present time) who is the center of the space-time. And, the phenomenon the cognition-subject can directly perceive is only the phenomenon to occur in the surface of the umbrella like that.
	Therefore, it can say the other place of the space-time is true darkness if it sees it from the viewpoint of the direct perception. (Caution ! This was stated about the characteristic space-time persistently. November 10, 2003.) As it stated before, it relates to the idea that the photon and the time are each aspect from the certain existence. At any rate, the reality needs to keep the consistency for the cognition-person and for someone staring at this world with seeing through the cognition-person like that. Therefore, it is natural that the cognition-subject can't see anything except the above mentioned surface. This is truth doubtlessly because my experience says like that. Needless to say, the transparent umbrella covering the space-time is advancing toward the future together with the cognition -person in its characteristic speed. However, to tell the truth, it also can think he and the umbrella like that aren't moving at all in this case. In other words, it can think his perception or the reality for him occur because the photon coming from his past collide against his characteristic time supposed to come from his future.
	Therefore, in this case, it can think that the quickness of him to his future is same as the quickness of his characteristic time if it supposes he is moving through the time axis at the so-called space-time, that is, objective space-time. In other words, it can think the movement of him like that is the work of the time itself. And, it is natural that the vector of time is the reverse vector of photon in this case. If the above relationships are changed of the real world, we and the universe would fall into the severe confusion. And, in that reason, I am negative against the time-travel to be challenged in the time-machine or other. It is because it seems the action like that crashes the universe, though it doesn't seem originally time-travel is possible. Therefore, please don't try to do the time-travel, and so on. This is serious advice. At any rate, it seems the universe is being created very well for perception. As for me, it doesn't seem the aspect of the universe is the result of coincidence if it sees it from the viewpoint of the perception. It seems the will of something concerns the thing probably. (It seems it is the volition of the perception. February, 2005).
3, Subjective time and the theory of relativity.
	The photon and the time make the cognition-person remain to this world having the consistency, as it stated before. It can understand the thing easily, if it recollects a person standing with the back toward his reality often falls into the recognition not having consistency. At any rate, his characteristic time passes through him toward the past from the future. And, its quickness is same as the quickness of the photon. This never be a figure of speech because it is said each axis of the space-time can change into the mutual axis mathematically.
			By the way, it seems his position is gradually shifted toward his future at the space-time, though it stated the thing many times. By any chance, would it be because the quickness of his characteristic time is slower than photon ? However, it seems that it is different against the truth a little because it is impossible the consistency for perception is kept between the space-time and the cognition-person if the cognition-person isn't in the stationary speck making the time collide against the photon. (The above statements were revised as follows. The quickness of the person advancing toward the future is same as the quickness of current of the characteristic time, and is the same as the quickness of the photon. November 11, 2003.)
	At any rate, if photon and the characteristic time of the cognition-person are each aspect from the certain existence, it may be that the time born from the existence like that is perceived as the emitted photon from the said object.
	If so, the time may be the being of photon as the electric current is the reversed current of the electron. Or, would it have to say it separates to the time and the photon at the position of the said cognition-person ? By any chance, as Empedokles said, the thing conversely may be the result by the particle of something given off from the said cognition-person. Whichever expression you choose, it seems it expresses the same meaning. At any rate, it is the natural conclusion that it thinks the cognition-person is the center of this world at the characteristic space-time because it seems that it is like that even at the physical world certainly.
		Therefore, it can say that the position like that is the only position(stationary mathematical speck) of the said cognition-person's ego. (As for this ego, since it is different a little from the ego who Dr. Freud stated, please see the 9th knot and 10th knot of the "civilization and living body". November 12, 2003.) Once, I named the position like that "the singular point of the cognition". And, it seems the scientific singular point called big bang is the logical result from the singular point of the cognition. It is because the Idea with the emotion as the footing of the cognition-person creates the various universes with becoming the singular point for the perception when the volition of perception occurs. However, this is my subjective recognition probably having the consistency.
	By the way, at above statements, it often stated the photon is given off from his past and arrives to the cognition-person. But, to tell the truth, it is different from the fact a little. As a matter of fact, it runs as a undulation of light, not as photon. In other words, it is perceived as photon only in a moment where the undulation like that arrives at the said cognition-person. Moreover, the undulation like that exists as the certain possibility, not as reality until a moment where it is perceived by something. Not until it is perceived by the said cognition-person, it can exist as photon, that is, the existence of reality. But, since it is certain that the photon is the actual existence, it isn't that it stated it like that, trying to deny the usual recognition. By the way, the subjective speed of the person to advance to the future becomes faster as his age is grown. Of course, as it stated before, it is because his curious mind is lost gradually. It seems it resembles the situation where a person arrives at the destination, doing a doze on the bus. "What ! Have I arrived yet ?". It seems it is the feeling like that probably. In other words, the information he perceives consciously is decreased gradually as his age is grown. As for me, it seems it resembles the objective sight of our universe. At any rate, it can say the subjective time passes faster than before increasingly because of the dull reaction to the stimuluses. And, the thing also is correlated to the objective time . It can understand the thing at once if it can imagine the feeling of time of the mice and so on having the short life span.
	It is because it seems that the life span is correlated to the amount of the information the said cognition-person receives in per unit time at the characteristic time. In passing, the subjective time isn't the characteristic time of the object in motion, that is, the cognition-person itself as it is so. (In this case, the "object in motion" is the expression from the viewpoint of the natural science.). Then, when the said person's speed of subjective time at the space-time exceeds the speed of the photon, that is, when the information by the physical medium won't be received by him, his subjective time evaporates suddenly. And, his characteristic time also is lost probably. In other words, it would be the said person disappeared from this world.
	It seems the human's life span at the objective time is for about 100 years at the longest. But, if it is measured as the subjective time, it seems there is a considerable difference, corresponding to the personal condition. In other words, it seems that the amount of information to catch the consciousness decides the length of his subjective life span. And, as it stated before, it is natural that his subjective life span correlates also with the physical life span to a certain extent. Today, it is said many cells of brain of the person not using the brain must die, growing weak because of the dull feeling like that. Therefore, the objective life span becomes shorter because of the handicap like that. In other words, the subjective time relates to the objective life span even in the meaning like that.
			As it stated before, it is because the length of subjective time is changed because of the amount of information the consciousness catches. It seems it can apply the thing also even to the single-cells and to our body's cells. By any chance, it may apply even to the material particles if the particles like that can perceive something. But, it apparently seems to be difficult to think that the subjective recognition is in the particles like that if it thinks of the thing with the common sense. However, it isn't clear conclusion because conversely, the particles may have only subjective recognition conversely if it considers the fact that the behavior and life span of the particles are irregular. (This sentence was added at this English edition. November 12, 2003) At any rate, the particles have the ability to perceive something. If not, it doesn't seem the particles can react to other physical object. But, it seems the many people think the human perception is different from the particles's perception. How do you think about it ?
	As it stated before, his subjective time becomes longer if the meaningful information is abundant for the said person. Conversely, if the information like that is a little, the subjective time becomes shorter. And, in this case, the subjective speed for him to go to the future becomes faster. However, conversely, if the aspect of the time is seen from the viewpoint of the objective recognition, it is said that the time of the object in motion becomes longer as the speed of the object in motion becomes close to the speed of photon, according to the theory of relativity. In other words, the subjective world shows a reverse aspect against the objective world from the viewpoint of symmetry in the above meaning, if cognition-person's characteristic time become the center axis. (To tell the truth, this part was written as the joke because this comparison isn't keeping the complete symmetry. I'm sorry. November 12, 2003.) Anyhow, it seems there is one universal conception between the subjective world and objective world probably. (This isn't as the joke.) By any chance, there is even the possibility the conception like that is used for physics in the future. It is because it may be impossible any more that the theory physics be kept without the conception like that.
	By the way, if it reasons from the above about the relationship of the black hole and me, it comes to the very uncanny conclusion that it is almost unidentifiable. By any chance, wouldn't it seem the black hole exists as the cushion to keep the consistency between the universe and perception ? It is because anybody can't perceive the state of the inside of the black hole in principle. In other words, it is because it seems that the fundamental contradiction disarranging the logical consistency for the perception is inherent in the universe. By any chance, wouldn't it be that the black hole be hiding the contradiction like that ? However, it seems it is difficult that it gets the conclusion at once. Therefore, for the moment, it gave up that it states the thing.
End.
cotosiro