Relationship between the black hole and me.
	This was first written in Japanese in 29th March, 2000 in Justnet, and also was translated into English soon. But, since it was the unsatisfactory performance because of my poor English, it rewrote this many times at Nifty. This was revised in March 22, 2009.
Subjective time and characteristic time and photon.
		It often is said in not only Japan but also the other countries Time flies like an arrow. Recently I found the relationship between a black hole and me from this idiom. To tell the truth, it is that I had kept on looking for this relationship many years because it seemed this relationship is very serious for me. Therefore, it is difficult it explains this relationship in the simple words. Before explaining this relationship, it first has to state the relationship between the sense about length of time and the quickness of light, that is, the quickness of photon. Therefore, please have the patience a little to listen because it is easy explanation if it could understand, though it is certain it is just a little troublesome.
	1, Time and the feeling to time.
	It seems we feel the length of time becomes shorter increasingly than before, as we age. It probably is the feeling common to us since you are also to be caught to the impression like this as well when your past occurs to oneself, flashing across the mind suddenly. However, why would we be caught to the feeling like that? Probably, it seems it is because his reaction to the stimuluses coming from outside world becomes weak as time goes on if it explains in psychology-like interpretation. In other words, we react to the daily stimuluses automatically with a little consciousness, with getting accustomed to the stimuluses like that after all as we age. Why would we fall into the situation like that? We, when exposed to one stimulus, necessarily react, caught to the understanding it once got about the stimulus like that. It would be we are apt to not try to think of the stimulus like that so deeply when it understands once. Therefore, it is that we lose the curiosity about the outside world gradually, and, in that reason, are making new understanding difficult.
	However, when we were in infant period, new discoveries appeared one after another in front of us. In that reason, there almost isn't the chance the infants look back on the past. In other words, it can say the subjective time in a infant is longer considerably than a adult when the objective time is adopted as the standard. It would be that it is because the phenomenon to catch the consciousness appears without a break for infants. The subjective time is measured in the density of stimulus to be accepted as information by the cognition-person. Therefore, it is that the subjective time of adult is shorter, when compared with children. However, would the difference of subjective time in between a infant and a adult be by only the mental factors? I think it isn't so. It thinks the subjective time is related to not only the mental factors but also a natural law. Needless to say, it is natural that the subjective time isn't the so-called time, that is, objective time. But, it states the details later.
		Dr. Einstein says the objective time has relative length corresponding to each observer, by the theory of relativity. In other words, the length of objective time isn't changeless. Then, he says the time(objective time) about the object in motion becomes longer than before as the quickness of the said object in motion becomes close to the quickness of photon. If so, when the person is riding the spaceship flying with the quickness like the photon, would it be that he can live for example for more than several hundred years? To all appearances, it doesn't seem it is so. Even if he lived long in the spaceship in question, the life span for him would be about one hundred years at most. However, when he returned to the earth narrowly in the end of his life span, several thousand years or ten thousand years may be passing if it is measured with the time of the earth, not his time. But, he wouldn't have the actual feeling like that. If it guesses his actual feeling, it seems it is for about 100 years probably.
	By the way, there is one question here. Which time would his time be in this case? Would it be time having measured when he was riding on the spaceship? Or, else, would it be time having measured when he arrived at the earth? To tell the truth, his time is nothing else but to be his time. But, until the spaceship touches down to the earth, it is possible to say his time is same as the time measured in the spaceship. In that meaning, when the spaceship begins to approach to the earth with slowing the quickness gradually, his time becomes gradually close to time measured in the earth. Therefore, it is natural that at a moment where he arrives at the earth, his time becomes almost same as the time measured in the earth.
	However, as it stated before, his time is nothing else but to be his time. In other words, it is that the former statements were only stated from the viewpoint of other observer, not from the viewpoint of him. When we perceive something, we exist as the cognition-subject persistently. However, wouldn't many people be forgetting the thing ? Anyhow, it is that the time for himself is measured with his characteristic time persistently. And, the thing makes me feel the certain relationship between the subjective time and objective time, though it still isn't so clear. The thing would become clear as it does the reasoning about time. But, it seems it is certain time has the same characteristic as the photon. Furthermore, it seems the characteristic time is measured in the quickness of photon. However, it states its details in the following short knot.
	2, Time and photon.
	In the above statement, it showed time for the object(someone or something) in motion is measured with the characteristic time for itself. Therefore, it can't say it is time of himself or of itself if it is measured with time of others. It is that time of others persistently is time the observer measures. By the way, as it stated before, it seems there is the common point between the characteristic time and the quickness of photon when it sees from the certain viewpoint. It is said usually the quickness of the object in motion can't have the absolute value because it correlates with the movement of other objects. The value like that is decided by the relative relationship in between the said object in motion and other object in motion persistently. In other words, it seems that it shows the characteristic quickness the object in motion has doesn't exist. However, as for photon, it has the characteristic different from ordinary object in motion at the meaning like that. The photon running in a vacuum has the changeless quickness without the relative relationship with all object in motion. Therefore, an observer on the earth can see the spaceship goes away from the earth with the quickness close to photon. If so, even if it considers the theory of relativity, it can say characteristic time for object in motion and also the quickness of the photon both are the absolute standard in principle for perceiving this universe. In other words, characteristic time for object in motion relies on only the quickness of photon. This is important very much for the future reasoning. It is because it seems that the quickness of photon and also characteristic time relate with the various perception directly. And, to think about that problem, it also is important to consider subjective recognition as well. Even if it is the perception of the physical phenomenon, it is first the personal perception before being the objective perception. In other words, it is that it is subjective perception originally at least until the recognition like that is verified scientifically. I think all stimuluses including the reaction in between substances function as information. And, the said creature or said substance as the recipient of information show certain reaction for information like that, corresponding to their characteristic logistic calculation. It is because it thinks the logistic function is immanent in creature and substance, and so on. Anyhow, at least at first, it seems this is subjective reaction based on subjective recognition. To tell the truth, I am secretly imagining even the reaction between substances is based on subjective recognition. In that reason, I think it also is important to consider the relationship between subjective world and objective world as well even for research in science.
		By the way, the human ego keeps on advancing toward the future from the present position along the time-axis. Or else, would it be better to say time passes toward the past from the future through the human ego? At any rate, it seems this is very similar to the relationship between the electric current and the current of electron. Therefore, as it stated before, it is that it can think time like that is based on the quickness of the photon in vacuum. If so, characteristic time like that would have to be measured in the length of the straight line drawn between present position cognition-person possesses and past illuminants. It is because the photon which would arrive at him brings the information on the moment of the certain past. (In this case, as for a vector of the photon, it is directed to his ego.). Therefore, it is that it has to think that the photon is advancing toward the opposite direction against the current of time toward present position cognition-person possesses. In passing, the ego I stated above is different a little from the ego Dr. Freud stated. The details are stated in "The complementary explanation about the ego".
	As it stated before, the relationship between the photon and the current of time is similar to the relationship between the current of electron and the electric current. That is, time corresponds to the current of electron. And, the photon corresponds to the electric current. In that reason, it can understand time and photon as each aspect the certain existence shows us about oneself. However, it isn't clear at the moment. I hope the existence like that becomes clear in future though it seems the existence like that is the footing for the cognition. As it stated before, it seems the cognition-subject is always in the present position where time collides to photon. Or else it may be better to say an instant, time overlaps with the photon on the mathematical speck the cognition-subject possesses. At any rate, it seems the collision like that causes the perception. And, since the quickness of the photon supposed to be the footing of characteristic time is changeless, it is natural that the quickness of current of characteristic time also is changeless. However, by any chance, there may be a person pointing out the time lag where the information coming from the past is transmitted with the neural systems. But, it seems the objection like that is meaningless because it is that it was stated as the physical impression from the viewpoint that the cognition-subject is the mathematical speck. The reference: The physical world seen from the cognition-subject..
	By the way, would it be possible we see one's former self directly? It as a time imagines carelessly that it may be possible to directly see one's former self in some way if the photon comes from the past. However, unfortunately I haven't the experience like that. And, probably you also seem to be so as well. As it thought, it seems it is impossible in reality to see one's former self. The reason is easy. If someone wants to look at one's former self, he has to go to the future earlier than the photon. Then, he, making his characteristic quickness slower, has to be waiting the photon supposed to arrive at him. However, every object in motion can't move faster than the photon and also can't change the quickness of current of its characteristic time. Therefore, it is that it is impossible it sees one's former self even if it is the gods or goddesses if it acts in this world, having the body. Needless to say, since the self reflected to the mirror is the indirect perception same as the photo, it isn't adopted in this case.
			When the person advances toward the future along time-axis, its characteristic quickness is changeless persistently. It is because the quickness of current of his characteristic time is changeless as the quickness of the photon is changeless. In other words, the cognition-person supposed to always be in the mathematical speck called present can see exactly object in motion only in space-time able to keep the quickness of the photon as the constant. If not, the consistency between the recognition and space-time would collapse at once. In passing, in this case, the recognition gotten from the existent relic, the books, and so on is understood as the indirect perception. In other words, the universe we see is only the surface of the thickness-less transparent umbrella spreading toward the past from the position of cognition-subject who is the center(present time) of the space-time. It is that we can see only the individual phenomenon to occur in the surface of the umbrella like that. Therefore, it can say the other place of the space-time is true darkness if it sees it from the viewpoint of the direct perception. Probably, this statement is based on my idea that the photon and time are each aspect from the certain existence. Anyhow, reality needs to keep the consistency between the perception and space-time for the cognition-person and for someone staring at this world through the cognition-person like that. Therefore, it is that the cognition-person can see nothing besides the above mentioned surface. This is truth doubtlessly because my experience says like that.
	Needless to say, the transparent umbrella covering the space-time is advancing toward the future together with the cognition-person in its characteristic speed. However, to tell the truth, it also can think he and the umbrella like that aren't moving at all in this case. In other words, it is that it can think his perception or the reality for him occur because the photon coming from his past collides against his characteristic time supposed to come to him from the future.
	3, Subjective time and the theory of relativity.
	The photon and time make the cognition-person remain to this world with keeping the logical consistency between the perception and phenomenon, as it stated before. Needless to say, it is because the quickness of photon and characteristic time are the absolute standard necessary to measure all in this world for cognition. It can understand the thing easily, if it recollects a person standing with the back toward reality often falls into the recognition not having consistency. Anyhow, his characteristic time passes through him toward the past from the future. And, its quickness is same as the quickness of the photon. This never be a figure of speech because it is said each axis of the space-time can change into the mutual axis mathematically.
		By the way, apparently the above statement may make a person feel the position of cognition-person is gradually shifted toward his future at the space-time. By any chance, would it be because the quickness of the current of his characteristic time is slower than photon actually? However, as you thought, it is different from the truth a little. It is because it is impossible to keep the consistency between the space-time and perception if the quickness of photon isn't same as the quickness of the current of characteristic time. As it thought before, it seems it is better to think the present position doesn't move. In other words, it should think time and photon move to the converse direction against each toward cognition-subject with the same quickness. Anyhow, if photon and the characteristic time are each aspect from the certain existence, it may be that the time born from the existence like that is perceived by the thing the photon emitted from the said object arrives at the cognition-person. If so, the time may be the being of photon if it considers the thing the electric current is the reversed current of the electron. Or, would it have to say the unknown existence like that separates to the time and the photon at the position of the said cognition-person?
	By any chance, as Empedokles said, the thing conversely may be the result by the particle of something given off from the said cognition-person though I think it is undulation, not particle. Whichever expression you choose, it seems it has the same meaning. Anyhow, it is certain that the stationary mathematical speck the said cognition-person's ego possesses is only one position for perception, and is present speck of time-axis. (As for this ego, it is different a little from the ego Dr. Freud stated. The details are stated in "A civilization and ego" and " The complementary explanation about the ego". November 12, 2003.)
		Once, I named the position like that "the singular point of the cognition". It is because nobody can know about the being of the mathematical speck like that at least logically and with causation. Furthermore, I think the scientific singular point called big bang is only the logical result from the singular point of cognition. It is because it thinks the Idea with the emotion as the footing of the cognition-person creates the various universes with becoming the singular point for the perception when the volition of perception occurs. However, this is my subjective recognition supposed to have the consistency. At above statements, I often stated the photon, given off from the past, arrives at the cognition-person. But, to tell the truth, it is different from the fact a little. As a matter of fact, it is that it is a undulation of light, not photon. When the undulation arrives at the said cognition-person, it is perceived as photon. In other words, the undulation exists as the certain possibility, not as reality until a moment where it is perceived by someone or something. Not until it is perceived by someone or by something, it can materialize as photon, that is, the existence of reality. Needless to say, since it is certain the photon is the actual existence, it isn't that above statement was stated to deny the usual recognition.
	By the way, as it was stated many times, the subjective quickness of the person to advance toward the future becomes faster as he ages. Needless to say, as it stated before, it was because his curiosity to various phenomenon is lost gradually. If it states the thing from the other viewpoint, it was because amount of information he accepts decreases with accelerative condition. It seems it resembles the situation where a person arrives at the destination, doing a doze on the bus. "What! Have I arrived yet ?". It seems the sense of time falls into the situation like that as a person ages. I feel the situation the sense of time like that falls into resembles the objective sight of our universe. It is because it seems the information from the universe keep on decreasing, as the universe ages. Anyhow, the subjective time passes faster than before increasingly because the reaction to the stimuluses becomes weak as it ages. And, it can't say the thing doesn't relate to the objective time. It can understand the thing at once if it can imagine the sense of time of the mice having the short life span. It is because it seems that the life span is related to the amount of the information the said cognition-person receives in per unit time measured with characteristic time. In other words, your subjective time becomes long, as the amount of information which you accepted in per unit time increases. And, your objective life span also becomes long probably.
	But, this isn't that the life span becomes long with getting much knowledge. It is because it always isn't accepting much information even if it is learning various knowledge. Rather when it is learning something, it may be better to think the amount of the accepted information is fewer than the cases it is doing other thing. Consider the thing that the amount of information accepted unconsciously is more much than the conscious learning. And, also, consider the thing that the nerve cells or other die one after another if it isn't given the information(stimulus, nourishment) at all. Needless to say, subjective time in object in motion isn't same as characteristic time. TThe characteristic time is the footing of subjective time and also objective time persistently. And, when you think about characteristic time, pay attention to the thing that characteristic time isn't time of the observer because we are apt to think the characteristic time is so-called time, that is, objective time, before noticing. Characteristic time I state has to be understood as characteristic of the object in motion itself persistently.
	(In this case, the "object in motion" includes a person or creature. And, it is the expression from the viewpoint of the natural science.). In connection with that, it shows one interesting logical conclusion about the death of a person here. That is, since the information by the material medium won't be received by the said person if the quickness of subjective time in him at the space-time exceeds the quickness of the photon, the subjective time evaporates suddenly. And, his characteristic time also is lost probably at the same time. In other words, it is that he disappeared from this world at that time. It seems the human's life span at the objective time is for about 100 years at the longest. But, if it is measured with the subjective time, it seems there is a considerable difference, corresponding to the personal condition. In other words, it seems that the amount of information to catch the heart influences the length of his subjective life span. This has no relation to whether it accepted the information like that consciously or not. And, as it stated before, it is natural that his subjective life span correlates also with the objective life span at a certain extent.
			Today, it is said as for the person not using the brain, many cells of his brain die one after another, growing weak because of the dull feeling. Therefore, the objective life span becomes shorter because of the handicap like that. The subjective time relates to the objective life span also in the meaning like that. As it stated before, it is because the length of subjective time is changed because of the amount of information the heart catches. Therefore it can apply that reasoning also even to the single-cells and to the cells of our organs if it considers the death of the cells of the brain it stated above. Furthermore, the above reasoning about subjective time may apply even to particles(a substance) if the particles like that can perceive something. It is because it think all material reaction is a kind of perception. How do you think about it?
	Anyhow, if the information accepted by someone is abundant, his subjective time becomes longer. Conversely, if the information like that is a little, subjective time becomes shorter. And, in this case, the subjective quickness for him advancing to the future becomes faster. However, it is said time of the object in motion becomes longer as the quickness of the object in motion becomes close to the quickness of photon, according to the theory of relativity. In other words, it seems subjective time shows a reverse aspect against objective time from the viewpoint of symmetry in the above meaning, if it make characteristic time for cognition-person the center axis. Anyhow, it seems there is one universal conception between the subjective world and objective world probably. By any chance, there is even the possibility the conception like that is used for physics in the future. It is because it may be impossible any more that the theory physics be kept without the conception like that.
	By the way, if it reasons from the above about the relationship of the black hole and me, it comes to the very uncanny conclusion that it is almost unidentifiable. It is because black hole itself doesn't give off information at all though a kind of information is given off from the surrounding area of black hole. By any chance, it may be that the black hole exists as the cushion to keep the consistency in between the universe and perception. It is because it seems that the fundamental contradiction disarranging the logical consistency of the perception is in the universe. However, it seems it is difficult to believe this imagination firmly at once. So, for the moment, it stopped stating its details.
End. Old editionRelationship between black hole and me
cotosiro