The origin of Japanese culture and, the world view as its logical conclusion.
	It revised the former edition. Hiromasa Noguti. December 19, 2011.     It partly fixed the language of html in July 24, 2016. It fixed the language of html in February 10, 2017.       --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------    To old edition.
	4. The worldview Jomon people think. 4-4. The worldview lurking to us.
	If it follows the worldview Jomon people think on, we are living in this world understood as the appearance of the gods and goddesses, not in mere physical world. In other words, that means there is possibility all things of this world tell us something. And, in this case, the first words emitted from the god or goddess were the name of the said god or goddess. It is because the name like that expresses the divine nature, that is, the characteristic of the god or goddess. However, it isn't the god or goddess tell us one's name unilaterally. That is the conceptualization and phenomenon caused between the people and the god or goddess persistently. Needless to say, in this case, we are the "subject for perception", that is, the cognition-person. And, the existence telling us one's name is the "object for perception". In other words, the conceptualization and phenomenon need a spirit who want to perceive something and also a spirit who wants to be perceived. And, not until the god or goddess, that is, the "object for perception" is conceptualized, it becomes the phenomenon for the cognition-subject. If it explains it with the physics's concepts, it can say not until the cognition-subject makes the object, that is, undulation materialize as the phenomenon, that is, particle, the object like that is perceived as the actual existence with being conceptualized. But, the above-mentioned relationship isn't causation. It should think that it is the logical relationship. Then, to tell the truth, the object is different from undulation at all. The god or goddess to be the object itself emits undulation for cognition-subject, as the evidence of existing. Therefore, if it says in exact expression, the object itself is soul, not undulation persistently. We can perceive only the undulation the god or goddess, to express oneself, emits or the combination of the undulations, as it stated before. It is because it is impossible to perceive the soul itself at all if it thinks with the viewpoint of the physics. So, the above mentioned conceptualization is not necessarily limited to being carried out by the words. Especially, when the object is still unknown, it seems that it is better to say the distinction, that is, the primitive of conceptualization occurs before it is conceptualized. And, the first distinction occurs between cognition-person and the whole of the object. In other words, the cognition-person distinguishes oneself from the "object for cognition" though the cognition-person in this case should be called cognition-subject. Needless to say, it is natural that the individual objects are distinguished from each after the first distinction. So, It has to think that the conceptualization by language is the explanation for the distinction like that. At least as for the human being, it would be that it thinks such explanation about the distinction the name of the said object, that is, the name of that spiritual existence. By the way, the human being not only perceives something but also is always perceived by something. It seems to be the natural conclusion if it considers the relationship between the human being and human being. Furthermore, the Mother Nature always tells us one's name with uttering the words as a time, if it follows the worldview Jomon people think on. As a matter of fact, it means the Mother Nature as phenomenons is perceiving us whenever we perceive the Mother Nature. In other words, it can think that each natural phenomenon is the cognition-subject with soul. Needless to say, the way for perception the cognition-subject like that has would be different from our way. However, if the above reasoning is proper, it has to say that not only human being but also all the soul(gods and goddesses) not only can perceive each but also can exchange the information with each. Rather it may be better to say this world is composed of the information like that. The soul, that is, god or goddess is the actual existence persistently though it isn't the reality. Not until it is summoned to this world by the cognition-subject, it can be perceived as the reality. And, it is nothing else but to be the conceptualization and materialization(phenomenon) of a soul(god or goddess) emitting the undulation. In this case, if it is said about the cognition-subject, it is said to be "conceptualization". And, if it is said about the object, it is said to be "phenomenon". Therefore, one phenomenon is the self-expression a soul, that is, a god or a goddess gives off, as it stated before. But, if the phenomenons as the parts of one phenomenon are taken up as the "object for cognition", the parts like that all also are the self-expression of each soul(god or goddess) persistently. In other words, one god or one goddess is composed of many gods and goddesses. Needless to say, the self-expression like that is allowed to materialize with exchanging a information only in this world, not in the spiritual world. The souls existing in the spiritual world, that is, gods and goddesses staying in the spiritual world are distinguished by nobody and also can't make action. Not until the god or goddess(a soul) stimulates the cognition-person with emitting the undulation, it can be given the conceptualization called the distinction. And, that is the phenomenon the cognition-subject perceives. Therefore, it can say that the soul(god or goddess) staying the spiritual world is one, is countless and is zero though it never be nil probably. In other words, it is the illogical existence. It is said that all the things of the material world exist with the nature of undulation and particle, according to the modern physics. And, needless to say, we can't see the undulation itself. So, assume it emits the light toward the screen through the two slits. In this case, even if it could see the interference fringes of the light, it can say that it only saw the trace of the undulation, not the undulation itself. In other words, we can know the existence of the object with perceiving the trace of the undulation called the particle persistently. It is because we can't see the object itself though it is possible to guess the undulation to be there. Therefore, if one soul(god or goddess) tries to be perceived by something, the undulation out of him has to materialize as the particle which has the information corresponding to the way something like that has for perception. Needless to say, it is natural that someone or something in this case acts as cognition-subject. And also, god or goddess is object. In other words, the materialization and also conceptualization are born of the relationship in between the cognition-subject(a observer) and the "object for cognition". And, the aspects of the materialization like that and also of the conceptualization are decided by the relationship in between the cognition-subject(a observer) and the "object for cognition". As it stated before, it is that the undulation is perceived as the phenomenon, materializing as the particle for the said observer. If so, it isn't so hard to notice the relationship between the object for perception and the cognition-person have the point in common to the relationship of "Kan-musubi" and "Takami-musubi". As it stated before, it seems that the worldview at Jomon culture is based on the monism like dualism to understand the relationship like that to be important. In passing, if one observer firmly believes that the certain unknown existence, that is, the certain unknown undulation is in this world, and if the undulation like that doesn't lose the logical consistency with the real world, the undulation like that would materialize as the phenomenon in front of his eyes sometime. And, in this case, even if it asserts the observer brought such phenomenon to this world, it never be exaggeration. As it stated before, it is impossible that each soul(god or goddess) existing in the spiritual world is in the condition able to distinguish like the objects to exist into the nature. Furthermore, the spiritual world the Jomon people think is different from the unified Idea World with the simple structure if my conjecture that the conceptualization is born of the relationship in between the cognition-subject and the "object for cognition" is proper. In spite of that, if it follows the worldview Jomon people think on, all the concept exist as soul(god or goddess) and as the "object for cognition" and "cognition-subject", in the spiritual world. Furthermore, they are the actual existence unable to be perceived as far as it is there. It is certain it is contradiction if it thinks it logically. However, as it stated before, the spiritual world is illogical world. If it dare to explain it, it is the unidentifiable actual existence unable to get the materialization and conceptualization if cognition-subject doesn't exist. But, it is that it never be so-called nil.
NEXT PAGE			Introduction. The mental problems of Japan. # 1. Culture and civilization. Ecosystem and the diverse human world. # 2. The fundamental understanding to Japanese culture. # 2-1. The formation of Japanese peoples. # 2-2. About Japanese language. # 2-3. Japanese culture and the Japanese people's brain. # 3. The soul of Jomon lurking to Japanese gods and goddesses. # 3-1. The origin of Japanese double standard. # 3-2. The divine nature of the gods of the Koto-ama-tu-kami. # 3-3. The change in the divine nature at the gods and goddesses. # 3-4. The country of the gods and goddesses.
	# 3-5. The birth of Ebisu. # 4. The world view Jomon people think. # 4-1. The Jomon world : The profit and the barter economy. # 4-2. The religion for Jomon people. # 4-3. "The myth of birth of Japanese countries" and "the thought of Itak". # 4-4. The world view lurking to us. # 5. The subject and object to realize into "Kan-musubi" and "Takami-musubi". # 6. The physical world the cognition-subject sees. (Characteristic time, Subjective time, and Objective time.) # 7. The information and the cognition-subject.
Cotosiro