The origin of Japanese culture, and, the world view as its logical conclusion.
	It revised the former edition. Hiromasa Noguti. December 18, 2011.     It fixed the language of html in February 10, 2017.       --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------    To old edition.
	7. The information and the cognition-subject.
	In former knot, it showed the form of the space-time necessary for cognition-person's getting a perception. Thereupon, it has to think about information here. It is because a information is the important exterior factor of keeping the relationship between cognition-subject and "object for cognition". In other words, If a information is nowhere, the relationship between a cognition-subject and a "object for cognition" isn't established. Then, it has to notice that not until the stimuluses to be emitted in the space time are perceived by cognition-subject, it becomes information. Even if it is the stimulus the sender sent as a information, if the cognition-subject as the taker doesn't understand the stimulus in question as a information, it isn't a information for the said cognition-subject. Above things are the major premise of the future reasoning. By the way, it can understand that evolution of all creature to include the mankind not only is evolution of information but also is evolution of the perception form if it considers my paper titled "civilization and living body". Even if it asserts that evolution of the information the genes have is evolution of the perception form, it never be exaggeration. And, at the organism of higher forms, evolution of the form of the perceiving - perception form - evolved the mental footing called culture, that is, the acquired perception form. This means evolution and diversification of a information. Reference: Civilization and living body. And, evolution of organisms, that is, evolution of genetic information brings the diversification and evolution of the perception form. Furthermore, the diversification and evolution of the perception form like that brings not only the diversification and evolution of the information -contents of information- but also the diversification and evolution of form of the information. Needless to say, it is nothing else but to be evolution and diversification of the perceiving. It isn't so hard to understand this if it realizes the organism perceives the stimulus coming from the outside world as the certain information, with the characteristic "way of perception" - the perception form in the said organism. By the way, there is the case even the perception form also functions as a kind of information for others and even for the said cognition-person. So, it can assume evolution of all things to be evolution of the information and evolution of its medium finally. Thereupon, it shows the aspect of the formation(change) of information with the following equation at the moment. A = outside environment + inside environment + a inborn factor(or a receiver's original internal factor) for perceiving a information. Then, this chain of the equations was gotten from the chain of equations found out for the vector of the change of a living body. In passing, the chain of the equations for the vector of change of living body was evolved from the equations found out for the vector of the change of a society. In this case, the "A" of left side in the above equation is vector and expresses one set of the perceived information by one cognition-person. The explanation about this set is stated later because it is complex a little. Needless to say, this vector is gotten by calculating the right side of this equation. And in this case, the concept of information, at this equation not only includes the contents of information of the narrow meaning but also includes the form of information, that is, the medium and the rule on the said medium. So, the outside environment of the right side is the set of the stimuluses as information coming from the outside world. Then, the inside environment is the information the said cognition-subject already has. And, the information like that also includes the acquired information form. Therefore, it expresses not only occurance of information in the broad sense but also the vector making that information occur. And, when one stimulus is given, a person or other perceives it as information with his characteristic way of perception. Therefore, the contents of the "A" are different, corresponding to each cognition-subject even if each accepts same stimulus as information. By the way, it seems that the form of information to include the acquired form(a medium, a language or other) acts as information showing the way of the using and acts as information for bringing the emotional reaction. As it stated before, the information in the broad sense includes the acquired information form and the contents of information of the narrow sense. So, the information in the broad sense can be understood as culture. Needless to say, it is natural that the information in the narrow sense includes the emotional understanding. Thereupon, in the following chain of the equations, it shows the aspect of information transmission, and also expresses the change of information. A1 = an outside environment(Aa2+other factors)+ an inside environment(Ab2+other factors)                                                                                  + an inborn factor(or a receiver's original internal factors) to perceive information. A2 = an outside environment(Aa3+other factors)+ an inside environment(Ab3+other factors)                                                                                  + an inborn factor(or a receiver's original internal factors) to perceive information.                      |                     |                     |                     |                    |                     |                    |                     | A(n-1) = an outside environment(Aa n+other factors)+ an inside environment(Ab n+other factors)                                                                                  + an inborn factor(or a receiver's original internal factors) to perceive information. The appended number to the A or Aa or Ab each shows the converse turn of the time. In other words, the chain of equations shows the most new information, that is, the most new understanding, with appending the "1" to the A, Aa and Ab. The outside environment includes the "Aa(n)", that is, the direct cause to form the "A(n-1)". The inside environment includes the "Ab(n)", that is, the set of information which will be replaced to the "A(n-1)". Furthermore, there is the possibility the "A(n)", Aa(n+1) and the "Ab(n+1)", and so on are the blank as a time. In passing, the situation like that occurs because of "the erasure of the information", "the disappearance of the information" and "the situation unable to perceive the given stimulus as the information". Then, the "inborn factor" means the "information from genes", the "instincts" and the "original information form". The "receiver's original internal factor" is the concept to be used in the case that the material reaction is regarded as the information transmission in between the said substances. But, it can think that the emotional reaction is blank in this case. In that meaning, it can think that the processing of information always brings the same conclusion, if it is under same conditions. By the way, the A(n) not only is related to the said person's thinking, but also often is sent to the outside world as the information. Therefore, it can think that the "A1" is the newest information to be sent to the next taker in that point of time. Then, the "A2" is the information which is supposed to come to the "Ab2" for the said person, and is the information which is supposed to come to the "Aa2" for other person. Therefore, this chain of the equations shows the aspect of information transmission when the taker and the sender are different, at the "A1", the "A2", and the "A(n)", and so on. And, when the taker and the sender are the same, this chain of the equations shows the process of thinking and the change of understanding. As it stated before, each member in the above equation is the change member until the concrete concept is given. Not until concrete concept for the left side is given, the concrete concept to put in each member of the right side is decided, corresponding to the concrete concept of the left side. And, each member at that time is treated as the variable. For example, if the concept of the "dog" is selected, each member is given the contents of information necessary to understand the dog, that is, to form the concept of dog. And, in this case, there is the possibility the contents of each member often are changed as the evolution, degeneration, erasure, and so on. Furthermore, in this case, this chain of the equations shows the process for understanding the dog, that is, the process for forming the concept of dog. Needless to say, the "A(1)" in this case is the concept of dog the person processing this information understands. And, at that time, the value of vector the A(n) has is decided by the relationship between the said person's internal factors(the inside environment and inborn factors) and the stimulus he accepts as information. In other words, it decides how he understands a dog. For example, there would be the case the concept of dog he has tends to be strong dog like Doberman. And, at that time, the case the informations not relating directly to a dog are put into each member of the right side is general. By the way, as it is supposed from the chain of the equations, the thinking is the work exchanging information in the certain purpose. And, if it is seen from the other viewpoint, it also is the process of the logical and emotional calculation being repeated, to evolve a information or to create a information. Therefore, it doesn't seem that the thinking is the works being limited to only the said brain. Leaving the consideration of the consciousness body, it seems that the calculation in computer network is the simple example of the process like that. In other words, the calculation like that isn't the works of only the main computer. It always needs to get supported by the other computers, the various machines, and by the operator, the program and the data, and so on. In other words, the calculation in one computer gets carried out by exchanging the information among these computers and machines or other. Needless to say, this also can be applied to the process of individual creature's thinking as well. In other words, it seems that the thinking is the process of exchanging a information among the brain and the other organs or cells. If so, it can't think that only the brain get the conclusion at the information transmission like that. In other words, even a cell of the tip of a finger finds out the conclusion characteristic in him and shows the particular reaction. Then, if it examines the chain of the equations, it can notice that the genetic factor and the predecessors' knowledge, and so on are sent to the present takers, that is, the future sender as the information. Furthermore, it can think that even a thing without consciousness is the receiving subject or the receiving subject if the stimulus a substance gives off is treated as the information. In passing, I think that the sending subject and receiving subject mentioned above are cognition-subject. Anyhow, the receiving subject - taker and also sending subject - sender perceive the information in one's own way. As it stated before, the receiving subject also acts as the sending subject. But, this doesn't mean that the information to be exchanged there always is the same contents as the former information. In other words, the new information born by the sender's understanding or his reaction is sent to the takers supposed to function as the senders in future. And, the receiving subject having become the sending subject like that also sends the information based on one's understanding to the next receiving subject. By any chance, wouldn't this process be showing that the space-time itself is the existence like brain? At least for me, all the information transmission including the thinking seem to be the process of somebody's thinking. However, it feels that somebody like that is the illogical existence who is countless and is also one. And, it can think that all the mental and physical stimuluses can be a information. If so, we creatures also may be one process of the thinking like that and also be the medium. In other words, we also may be acting as the eyes and ears for the illogical existence like that. And, the existence like that is nothing else but to be me for me. And, it is that it also is you as well for you. The soul as the illogical existence looking to be unidentifiable appears in this world, materializing as the logical existence, that is, "Kan-musubi"(object) and "Takami-musubi"(subject), with the illogical jump. And, if so, it can think the aspect of the world is the expression of their relationship. Furthermore, it can think that the world like that is composed of the information which is exchanged between the cognition-subject and the "object for perception". The taker also is the sender. The above chain of the equations shows the aspect of the world like that really. And, the aspect of this world is the materialization of the gods and goddesses, if it follows the worldview Jomon people thought out. We seem to feel the respect and awe to the holy Mother Nature and to each individual at least at the bottom of the heart if we are aware of the relationship mentioned above. However, we almost are forgetting one's true mind like that now. The sense of the reverence and awe like that is about to be lost really. Wouldn't it be certain the condition like that brings the degeneration of the culture? The degeneration of the culture brings the confusion on the various standard and the social norms which is based on the culture. Today, the logic of civilization has become too strong. So, wouldn't it be that the people started to regard a person as a mere part of the various organization, that is, the substance to use ? It seems that the narrow-minded materialism like the nineteenth Century and worldview hard to get away from the influence of Newton accelerated the degeneration of culture. The world isn't simple existence able to understand in only the causation and logical relationship. But, it seems that the Jomon people had understood the being of world like that more deeply than us. If it evolves more logically the worldview Jomon people thought out, it seems that it produces the new worldview different from monotheism and also different from polytheism, based on the relationship in between the cognition-subject and the "object for cognition". And, the worldview like that would bring not only us but also all people the important wisdom. Anyhow, it seems that we have to notice our origin really now.
		Introduction. The mental problems of Japan. # 1. Culture and civilization. Ecosystem and the diverse human world. # 2. The fundamental understanding to Japanese culture. # 2-1. The formation of Japanese peoples. # 2-2. About Japanese language. # 2-3. Japanese culture and the Japanese people's brain. # 3. The soul of Jomon lurking to Japanese gods and goddesses. # 3-1. The origin of Japanese double standard. # 3-2. The divine nature of the gods of the Koto-ama-tu-kami. # 3-3. The change in the divine nature at the gods and goddesses. # 3-4. The country of the gods and goddesses.
	# 3-5. The birth of Ebisu. # 4. The world view Jomon people think. # 4-1. The Jomon world : The profit and the barter economy. # 4-2. The religion for Jomon people. # 4-3. "The myth of birth of Japanese countries" and "the thought of Itak". # 4-4. The world view lurking to us. # 5. The subject and object to realize into "Kan-musubi" and "Takami-musubi". # 6. The physical world the cognition-subject sees. (Characteristic time, Subjective time, and Objective time.) # 7. The information and the cognition-subject.
Cotosiro