Civilization and living body. The fundamental consideration to the evolution theory.		The ture character of object for cognition.
		by Hiromasa Noguti.
	This again was revised again in November 6, 2011. It fixed the language of html in February 9, 2017.
To old edition.		The vector of the change in society.
	The social formation-genetic factor group stated in former knot reacts not only to the natural environment and his "characteristic form and quality" but also to the social environment and so on. It is because these environments all belong to the outside world to react to if the genetic factors like that try to administer the formation of society(or colony). The social environment is an important external factor especially for the construction of the human society. In other words, if it is taken up as an ideal of the form, even if there is no change in the natural environment, there is the possibility the structure of the human society is changed if the above social environment change. However, if it sees the actual relationship between the human society and the natural environment, the society and the natural environment influence each other, keep changing the actual society and Nature. And, it can understand the above relationship as follows for the moment. (In passing, the idea-type, that is, the "ideal of the form" is the concept Max Weber advocated at social science.).
		The social structure ( the vector of the change ) =                     an outside environment( a natural environment + a social environment )                                                 + a genetic trait factor + a "genetical factor to administer the form of society".
	Needless to say, the 4 elements of the right side also are the vector. And, it can apply the above equation to all the organism. Then, this equation not only controls the behavior of the individual, but also decides even the direction of evolution. However, as for the details, it is stated in the next knot. By the way, what kind of a logic or power would lead each individual to construct the society ? And, what kind of a logic or power would maintain a living body(a society, a organism) ? As a matter of fact, it is that its two answers are same purpose, are the fundamental forces to make evolution materialize. But, it is explained at 5th knot, that is, the "Evolution and the political powers". And, in connection with the thing, the social problems we are faced with are born almost of the social environment keeping changing oneself. In other words, the individual or the society itself, with not finishing coping with the change like that, is caught to the misjudgment. Even if it says the troubles of the human society like that are the constant problem, it never be the exaggeration. Then, the volume of the energy to cause such troubles almost can't be seen in the society of other creature. Furthermore, one deeper fundamental cause is lurking to the undercurrent of the above-mentioned confusion. It is the collision of the logic of gene, that is, the logic of organization and the logic of individual. And, it also is the conflict of the self-preservation and the species-preservation in the viewpoint of source. Furthermore, the conflict like that should be understood to be the problem lurking in common to the inside of both the individual and society. As for the details, it is explained later. By the way, if the society or colony is visualized generally, it seems it is the community of the same species. In other words, if it is the society of wolves, it seems the society like that apparently is composed of only wolves without the other creatures. Then, the society of lions apparently looks to be composed of some lions only. In passing, the extent of the freedom about the shift of the members varies corresponding to the various environments, and is different corresponding to each species. And, it has to consider the shifts of the members like that as also our problem as well. However, as for our problem, it probably would be stated in other opportunity because the theme is different a little. Now, if it observes one community strictly, it can't assert that the members of that community are confined to the organisms of one species. It is because the organisms of one species and the organisms of another species often make one colony with cooperating together. It can take up the lichens in the cases like that. It is said the lichens are the community organized from the certain kind of marine algae and the certain kind of mushroom. And, the condition like that is called a symbiosis in biology. It can find out the trace of the morphosis like that even into the cells composing the multicellular organisms. In other words, it can find out the trace of the symbiosis into the relationship between the mitochondrion and chloroplast and the cell. It is said their ancestors were originally procaryotic cell, were the creature of the single cells. However, they, after making the symbiotic relationship with other cells, start to shift to the situation it is hard to live as each individual soon. And, it is said they combined each other as one cell as the result of evolution like that at last. In other words, it is said it became the eucaryotic cell composing generally the multicellular organism. If so, it seems it is already hard to think it is in the symbiotic condition. It rather would be better to think it is the organism of another new species usually. But, if so, would it have to decide the border line between the concept of a individual and the concept of a symbiosis organism how ? Probably, it seems it is related with the extent of the cooperative relationship. However, it doesn't seem this is the matter solved so easily with only the viewpoint like that. In other words, at the conceptions of individual, society, biological species, or other, it doesn't seem it can draw the border line between the contents of those concepts easily. It rather should think that those conceptions are a kind of the idea-type, that is, the ideal of the form extracted from a part of the actual situations. In passing, the idea-type, that is, the "ideal of the form" is the concept Max Weber advocated at social science. Therefore, when the concepts like that are applied to the real world, there is the possibility the concepts like that are replaced with the other concepts, corresponding to the chosen viewpoint by the observer and corresponding to the relationship between the organism's condition and the outside environment. And, if it can think that a organism, a society and a gene or other behave as the cognition-subject, the above logic can be applied to their recognition, also from the viewpoint of psychology. In other words, it can think that they also decide the outside or inside of oneself as the observer decides it. If so, as it thought before, it seems there is no definite boundary if it sees the biological concepts like that with the viewpoint of the creature's logic. Therefore the thing we definitely can say is only that the inherent factor moving the society and the ecosystem and so on is the same at least at its logic as the inherent factor moving the individual. It is because to all appearances, the inherent factor like that must be derived from the creature's logic. As for the creature's logic, already it was stated in the first knot. By the way, some time ago, at the equation of the vector of the change in the society, the outside environment was parted to two environments, that is, the natural environment and social environment. This would be the natural conclusion if the former reasoning is considered. It is because in the reason stated before, the social environment, corresponding to the condition of the object and to the chosen point of view, is regarded as the outside environment or the inside environment. And, if the former reasoning is proper, it seems the society is a kind of living body as it thought before. Needless to say, the individuals to compose the community like that are a organism. And, it also is natural that a human being also is organism because it is that it is acting under the creature's logic. However, as for a human being, it seems it is unclear whether it always is obeying the creature's logic. But, as for the activities of the human individual mind like that, it would have to be examined at other opportunity probably because it seems a philosophy-like consideration is necessary. It isn't so easy to find out the conclusion about the problem of human mind. But, it is possible to say as follows. That is, when the individuals try to make each mental activities permeate the society, the society decides under the creature's logic which mental activity it should select. However, there are many organizations and many individuals in the society. And, they all are acting under the creature's logic. In other words, the various living bodies always are active in the society under the logic of administering a organization or of controling a individual. This means there is the collision among those logics. And, many of the conflicts like that are the conflicts in between the instinct of self-preservation and the instinct of species-preservation and in between each instinct of self-preservation. Therefore, the above-mentioned society's selection goes well in the case that the creature's logic functions properly for society. And, needless to say, the selection like that often decides the destiny of its society. However, at our Japan, would the selection like that be proper now ? This is anxious problem. Anyhow, the society is the creature certainly if the logic mentioned above is proper. And, in the same reason, it can think even an ecosystem is one creature. The "lives" are a kind of information. And, the ship carrying the information called the "lives" isn't confined to only the so-called individual. A gene also is the ship carrying the information called the "lives". And, the society and the ecosystem and so on all are the ship carrying the information called the "lives" as well. Today, we would have to think about the thing deeply. However, the reasoning about the lives call up one more difficult problem. Who would be able to understand the information called the "lives" ?
Introduction.     1: What kind of thing is creature?    2: An Individual and the society.    4: The vector of the change of a living body. 5: Evolution and the political powers.    6: Political powers and social norms.    7: The two contradiction lurking to the creature world.   --------------  -------------   --------------  --------------   --------------   --------------  (1. Three logics 2. Biotechnology and creature's logic.) 8, Evolution and a civilization.    9: The logic inherent in civilization and ego.    10: The complementary explanation about the ego.   11: Evolution, information and a thinking.  (1. Information and thinking. 2 Evolution of information related to the evolution theory. 3. Thinking and the cognition-subject. ) As for the 11th knot, it first was written in 2001 year.
Cotosiro Home for English