Civilization and living body. The fundamental consideration to the evolution theory.		Evolution to be brought by chance and inevitably. The ture character of object for cognition.
		by Hiromasa Noguti.
	This again was revised again in November 6, 2011. It again added to this page the URL to link up, July 30, 2016. It fixed the language of html in February 9, 2017. Noguti Hiromasa.
To old edition.		The complementary explanation about the ego.
	In the former knot, it stated from the psychological viewpoint the following points, to understand the relationship in between the civilization and ego. 1: The origin of ego able to see in the similar state to the human being at the unicellular organisms. (note 1) . 2: The expansion and shrinkage of the ego. 3: Each ego to be fused. However, all these points contain the very delicate problems. Thereupon, a little more carefully it thinks about the ego at this knot. Usually, many persons may think the consciousness of himself to be ego. But, it seems that it is different a little from the truth. It rather seems that the ego only exists as cognition-subject, that is, the being perceiving the outside world.(Note 2). In other words, it seems the ego originally can't become the other existence, that is, the "object for perception". Therefore if it tries to notice one's ego, it has to move back from the present ego as the feeling. In other words, it first, with objectifying all recognized things by one's ego(the memory), has to observe those to exist as others. Then next, it has to take away in turn from the memorized phenomenon the existence different from oneself. The objects like that are not only the outside world and his body, contain also his heart. But, there is one thing it can't take away absolutely. It thinks that this is the cognition-subject, that is, the ego to be the being of "me". Even if the ego like that is taken away, in this case, the ego to take away the ego is necessary always. If not, would who take away the ego ? In other words, it can say that the ego is the cognition-subject and is the being it can't take away everlastingly. Really, it is "We exist because we think" as Dr. Descartes stated like that. In other words, it is possible to say the ego is the super-logical origin of all existence. Therefore, it thinks that the ego it stated is different a little from the ego stated by Dr. Freud who is the psychoanalyst. "I am me". It seems that the consciousness like that is born in the above process. In other words, it can say a person at that time has learned the existence of the ego whether it is conscious or not. Therefore, even if it is God, it can't perceive other person's ego. If all the things are taken away from the said person by the others, it is because the thing to be left is nowhere. In other words, no one can know whether other's ego exists really, or not. However, if so, why would it be possible that a person acknowledges other person's ego ? Probably, it would be because anyone believes firmly one's ego exists. In other words, for someone, it can say the other person having the same biological characteristics as oneself looks to have the ego so that one's self have one's ego. Therefore, it is nothing else but to be the acknowledgement occurring in analogy.(Note 3). If the method of the analogy is refused, by any chance, other person's ego may exist nowhere besides the delusion. "Any person has ego.". The statement like that hasn't more truth than analogy in this case persistently. Even if the said person stated "I have the ego", the above validity isn't lost. For example, toward your personal computer, ask " Have you ego ?". If at that time, your computer is under the condition the program to output with "yes" had been installed, the computer's answer would be "yes" surely. However, would such a answer be trustworthy ? As you see, the recognition a ego exists is not scientific truth. Rather, it is very personal truth. In other words, since the human being has the ability of the deep introspection, it can say it can acknowledge the existence of the other's ego. It is possible to guess the structure of the other person's heart. But no one can peep into the other person's heart directly. Therefore, it can say that a ego exists not only in human being but also in any organism if the organism like that perceives the outside world and if it is active on the outside world like that. And, it can't but say above statement is the truth also for you if you acknowledge one's ego. In other words, above statement has the truth in the same extent as the existence of the human ego. Then, since the ego is the "subject for perception" persistently, it doesn't seem the brain is always necessary for the ego. Furthermore, it doesn't seem the perception is established without the activity. In other words, on the one hand perception like that makes the said organism decide his behavior, on the other hand his behavior decides his recognition. Therefore, it has to think that all the existence with the characteristic like that has the ego whatever the form of the perception. It can assert that the recognition that only a human being has the ego comes out of our haughtiness. By the way, would each ego disappear in the case that more egos than the two are fused ? It doesn't seem it is so if it follows my experience. It probably is because the ego is the cognition-subject persistently. Usually, the cells composing the one organism are in the inside of the organism's ego like that. And, at that time, it can think that the cells' egos are in the fused condition to the organism's ego. However, even if it is the cells of the fingertip, it can say it is doing each individual perception, corresponding to the circumstances if the former consideration is proper. Therefore, it seems to be impossible that the ego disappears though it is possible to become the mathematical speck. (Note 4). If so, it can't assert that the disappearance of the organism always makes the ego disappear if the mental existence can exist without the material existence. Needless to say, the ego not only isn't the material existence, but also isn't the "object for the perception". If so, it may be possible that the ego exists without depending on material existence. But, it doesn't seem that the ego can be active in this world without depending on the material existence. However, it doesn't state the details, here. It stays to pointing out that the ego is the "origin for perception". By the way, we often are caught and influenced by others' recognition, get into the action before noticing the thing. Even if it is difficult to accept the thing, it is the obvious truth surely. The parents' recognition sneaks in to the children. The recognition of the owner sneaks in to the pet dog. Then, the recognition of the organization, that is, "a company, a society, a state, and so on" gets into the members' mind as well. And, the invaders like that give the members of the organization the strong influence secretly. Needless to say, it is certain its cause is the fusion of each ego. Then, the fusion of egos functions as the important inherent factor for generating the internal standards. And, as it stated before, the internal standard like that is perceived as the morality, the ethics, the custom, and so on. Needless to say, there is the creature's logic controling each member at the undercurrent of the internal standard. As it stated before, the creature's logic, trying to manage effectively the function of the society in the purpose of inheriting life, controls the individuals. The fusion of egos occurs for the thing. But, the creature's logic doesn't participate in the thing directly. That work is entrusted to the power's logic deriving from the creature's logic, as it stated before. If it states the thing more concretely, the powers mechanism shoulders the responsibility about that work. And, it seems the creature's logic, trying to fuse the egos, gives especially the youth the strong effect if the above consideration is proper. If not, it can't maintain the society because it is that the youth layer like that makes the future society. But, at the smoothly going society, since most adults have the proper internal standards, it seems that the creature's logic needn't give the people and society the so strong influence. However, today, there is the problem hard to feel easy like that. There is possibility the adults' internal standards are about to get into the dangerous situation. It seems to be because the function the creature's logic originally has is disturbed by the collision of three logics born of civilization. The fusion of youth layer's ego to the society is confined to the narrow extent still. In that reason, the social standards established in the interior of their heart are immature. Therefore, it seems the civilization tries to assimilate them to the society especially. However, recently, the civilization is developing in the speed not seen as the example in the past. And, the collision of three strong logics makes the mental friction worse increasingly. It can't assert that the circumstances like that don't pull not only the people but even the nation into the terrible confusion. Especially, since the youth layer's internal standards are still immature, it is natural that it suffers from such evil influence. If it compares the questionable behavior of the youth layer with one's mind carefully while checking one's questionable behavior, it thinks that it can find out that problem easily. The present period may be the era of the turning where the mental Messiah able to establish new standards with controlling the civilization's logic is wished. Therefore, even if the people are forced to obey the usual standard by the powers, it would never bring the good result because it is that the social standards are born of the fusion of egos persistently. It rather seems that the social circumstances become complex all the more if such a action of the powers is kept for long. And, it can't assert that the society doesn't fall into the more dangerous confusion. (Note 5). Today, the various evil customs are active, hiding behind every possible place of the society. And, such evil customs control certain people, with very strong force, and give the society the evil influence in spite of the tacit comprehension of only a part of the society. And, there are even the cases that it makes certain persons ignore the social norms as a time. Furthermore, such evil customs are creeping on even the system of original social standards secretly or in public now. In other words, such situation spoils the function of the system of social standards, distorting the interpretation of the original social standards. And, it seems that recently the internal standards each individual should have are about to degenerate into mere words. Needless to say, in this case, the evil customs like that are the acting person of the few people able to get the unreasonable profit because of the evil custom. The thing can be observed as the obvious fact at the organizations and the homes, and at even the individuals. Whenever there are such evil customs at the system of social standards, the youth becomes apt to doubt the social standards whole. And, it is natural that the thing is related to the various mental alienation. Originally, the system of social standards is supported by the fusion of the community's members' ego. But, especially recently, it seems that the fusion of the egos often is obstructed conversely because the evil custom invade into the system of social standards, in the above-mentioned reason. And also, in that reason, the system of social standards often cause the separation from the creature's logic. This is the very dangerous situation for the society. Therefore, the poisonous snakes(evil custom) twining to the social standards need to be taken away. In other words, the system of social standard has to be remade. If not, it may lead the civilization, the community and the mankind, and so on to the destructive circumstances. However, as it stated before, it doesn't seem to be possible that a system of social standards is born under compulsion. It is because the social standard is the appearance of the fusion of egos persistently. In other words, it needs the fusion of egos to construct a system of new standards. Needless to say, it needs to maintain the human independence because we aren't an ant. In spite of that, the powers often try to use the compelling request and the spiteful pressure to get the effect of the social norms. But, it seems it only functions as the excuse for the society and oneself probably. Rather such an action obstructs the fusion of egos. It seems that it only brings the society the harm. It shouldn't forget all the norms are based on the internal standards which is born of the fusion of egos persistently. Today, the runner called the civilization is running with the terrific speed with having gotten the tool called the capitalism. However, would it be possible that the civilized society composed of the persons stands this speed ? It can't assert that the individuals and society doesn't go into the different uncanny world from this world. Needless to say, this never be as a joke. At least for me, it seems it is very imminent problem. Or else, as it thought before, would it be the delusion from my neurosis ? Anyhow, it is certain the serious problem is lurking to today's human society. If you could know the present condition of our civilization precisely, what kind of future would you see in the inside and outside of the huge ship running in the terrific speed ? Note 1 The expression of "the origin of egos" followed the general understanding though in this case, it seems it is the ego itself. Note 2 . The outside world. In this case, if it explains it about the general circumstances, the "outside world" not only is the physical world and the other person's mental area but also contains the said person's mental area able to be the target of consciousness. Therefore, it is natural that the border between the outside world and the ego is changed corresponding to the expansion and contraction of the ego. Notice that the perception starts from the perceiving the existence which isn't oneself. And, it is natural that the judgement like that decides his behavior. Note 3 It seems it can apply the thing also to a consciousness. Even if his consciousness is judged to have disappeared in the medical viewpoint, as a matter of fact, it seems to be not clear. But, since today, an electroencephalograph is used, by any chance, the vagueness like that may have been solved. However, as for me, it seems that it isn't so clear. Note 4 Consciousness isn't same as a ego. Consciousness is lost as a time though the ego always exists. Only the ego is the "subject for perception" persistently. Therefore, it can say that the consciousness is the shutter and focus making the perception possible. Needless to say, the unconsciousness the psychoanalysis explains is the area of the mind the ego can't perceive. If so, why would it be impossible that it sees that area ? If it say the reason simply, it seems it is because the shutter of consciousness doesn't open toward the area of mind like that. In other words, it seems the ego doesn't push the shutter. Then, it can say the pre-consciousness is the area of mind not being focused for the moment. Therefore, if the said person tries to see it with all his heart, it is the area it can see. Note 5 It seems the introverted confusion is more terrifying than the exposed confusion. The confusion like that causes the more uncanny horror filled of doubts than the menace appearing as phenomenon, with being accumulated to the persons' mind. If its energy continues to be accumulated to the heart, it, bursting suddenly, may bring the big destruction to this world. Would it be finished in the destruction of oneself ? Or, would it be finished in the destruction of the outside world ? Anyhow, the introverted confusion would bring the horrific destruction. It seems it can understand the thing easily if it observes the recent detestable incidents a little.
Introduction.    1: What kind of thing is creature?     2: An Individual and the society.    3: The vector of the change in a society.    4: The vector of the change of a living body. 5: Evolution and the political powers.    6: Political powers and social norms.    7: The two contradiction lurking to the creature world.   --------------  -------------   --------------  --------------   --------------   --------------  (1. Three logics 2. Biotechnology and creature's logic.) 8, Evolution and a civilization.    9: The logic inherent in civilization and ego.    10: The complementary explanation about the ego.   11: Evolution, information and a thinking.  (1. Information and thinking. 2 Evolution of information related to the evolution theory. 3. Thinking and the cognition-subject. ) As for the 11th knot, it first was written in 2001 year.
Cotosiro Home for English