Civilization and living body. The fundamental consideration to the evolution theory.		The ture character of object for cognition.
		by Hiromasa Noguti.
	This again was revised again in November 6, 2011. It fixed the language of html in February 9, 2017.
To old edition.		The vector of the change of the living body.
	It explained the change of a social structure with the simple equation in former knot. As a matter of fact, that equation can be applied to the change in the structure of the various living body. In other words, each concept in an individual, a society, and a colony and so on can be substituted for the left side in the equation mentioned above. Needless to say, it doesn't mean that the values of those substituted concepts are equal. However, it seems that the concepts to be substituted like that include even an ecosystem to say the least. But, as you see, when that equation is given, the concept for the members in the right side are fixed for the concept of society put in the left side. In other words, the given members like that never be suitable for the future reasoning. So, the right side of the equation was replaced as follows for the moment because the concept of living body includes not only a organism but also a society and colony or other. The social structure (the vector of the change) = a outside environment(a natural environment + a social environment) + a genetic trait factor + a "genetical factor to administer the form of society". * The above equation is replaced as follows.                 A living body(the vector of the change ) =                         a outside environment + a inside environment + a "hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body". As it stated before, it can think that a society is a kind of living body. Therefore, it thinks that this replacement is proper. Needless to say, in this case, the living body in the left side and each member of the right side are a change member, not a variable. In other words, the change member means the blank able to be substituted with the selected concept persistently. And, not until a concrete concept to put in the left side is decided, the concrete concept to put in each member of the right side is decided. Needless to say, when the concrete concepts are put in the change members, each member is handled as the variable of the vector. Then, the following concrete concepts are substituted for these change members, corresponding to the theme. That is, those concepts are the certain individual, the certain colony, the certain society, the certain species, the certain ecosystem, and the certain natural environment, and so on. As it stated above, when the concrete concept of the left side is decided, the concrete concept to be substituted for each member of right side is decided, corresponding to the concrete concept of the left side. Needless to say, in this case, if it selects the natural environment as the concrete concept, it always has to substitute this concrete concept for the outside environment which is the change member of the right side, without considering the concrete concept of the left side. But, it is natural that the contents of that concrete concept are different, corresponding to the concrete concept of the left side. In other words, the contents of the ecosystem and society, individual, and "the hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body", and so on each are decided concretely corresponding to the concrete concept of the left side. Therefore, if it substitutes the characteristic form and quality as a concrete concept for the outside environment of the right side, it also has to put the social environment of the concrete concept in to the outside environment of the member of the right side. In passing, in this case, the concrete concept to be substituted for the left side is a gene, a cell, and so on. And, in the same process, each concrete concept to be substituted for the inside environment and the "hereditary factor to administer formation of a living body" or other is decided. Therefore, usually, many concrete concepts are put in the same change member at the same time. In other words, each vector shown by those concrete concepts is added as the vector of the said change member. For example, the following factors are taken to the inside environment of the right side when an ecosystem is put in the left side of the equation. That is, those are a genetic trait factor, a social environment, and so on, and are the environments and so on to be kept by the ecosystem at that time as well. If so, it has to think the concrete concept going into the left side also exists also to the right side. In other words, each member of the right side has the numerical formula of the right side. Its aspect is really fractal. So, the aspect like that appears as the layer structure of the concrete concept at this equation. Thereupon, suppose that the concrete concept to be substituted for the change member in the left side is the social formation. And, its vector is expressed as A1. Just then, the above equation becomes the following equation. A1(social formation)= outside environment + inside environment + a "hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body". So, if it tries to calculate about the right side at that time, it would notice the vector (A2) of change in the social form exists into the member of the inside environment. In other words, it can say the vector of the same concept like that appears on the member of the inside environment hierarchically as follows. A1 = outside environment + inside environment(A2+other factors)+ a "hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body". A2 = outside environment + inside environment(A3+other factors)+ a "hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body".                 |                 |                 |                 |                 |                 |                 | A(n-1) = outside environment + inside environment(An+other factors)+ a "hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body". In passing, the number appended to the "A" expresses the turn converse against time. Therefore, in this case, the "A1" is the newest vector. And, it seems that those equations can be applied properly even when the concept to put in the left side is the genetic factor. In other words, if the concrete concept for "the hereditary factor to administer the form of a living body" is substituted to the left side, as it was mentioned above, it makes the layer structure in the numerical formula of the right side as well. And, in this case, the left side means the change in the genetic trait. As a matter of fact, that is deeply related to evolution. It is because evolution is one of the changes in the genetic trait. In other words, it can think evolution occurs when the vector of the change in the genetic trait indicates the same irreversible direction at whole of the species or one colony. Thereupon, see this chain of the equations. It seems the vector of the change in the genetic trait shows the tendency to keep the certain vector, in the same period, the same area and the same species. Then, it doesn't seem that the change in the genetic trait like that functions so disadvantageously for the said organism if the violent change in the environment doesn't happen. It is because the "hereditary factor to administer the form of a organism" acts to also the genetic factor itself if the equation mentioned before is considered. In other words, it seems that the variants of the genetic factor are led to the cooperative relationship among the genetic factors, with some way though it doesn't seem they all are led to the situation like that. Probably, it seems that the thing also applies to the genetic factor coming into the organism from the outside world as well. Conversely, if one genetic factor gives the said organism the harm, it can think the function to give the harm like that is controlled to the certain extent in same reason. So, it seems evolution occurs because there is the mechanism like that. Furthermore, if it observes the chain of equations, it seems that the vector of the change is in the controled condition in the fluctuation of the narrow extent in the given period if it gets the certain value once. For example, the hourse's toes kept decreasing in the certain period and probably at the certain area, and became the hoof. Or else, as for the mammoth, his tusks kept becoming longer than before at the certain circumstances. In other words, it seems that the change in the genetic trait as the species brings the course of straight evolution frequently. It is because it is unacceptable that each vector of the members of the right side is changed irregularly at the short period if it observes the chain of the equations. In other words, it seems that the vector for evolution doesn't change so easily when the equation in question gets the certain value once. However, if it observes the members of the right side carefully, the scale of time at the change of vector may be different, corresponding to each member though it still can't show definite evidence. Anyhow, it can think that the relations shown by the above equations are the actual aspect of evolution. If so, even if the certain virus lengthened the neck of giraffe, it seems that the other members in the above equations influence the thing deeply. In other words, it can think that evolution like that is the result that the vectors of each member were added up. It would be that the certain genetic factor brought by the virus was changed or made to activate to lengthen the neck of giraffe by other factors. Certainly, it seems that the infection of the virus is the direct cause in this case. But, the direct cause like that never be a necessary and sufficient condition for at least evolution. Anyhow, if the above reasoning is proper, it reaches the conclusion like that. By the way, there is the certain thing which was forgotten of saying. It is the recognition to have about the standstill of the change in the genetic trait. That is, that is the recognition that the standstill like that is one state of the change. And, in this case the vector like that maintains the "characteristic form and quality" or physical condition about the said organism. If so, it can't assert there isn't possibility the certain vector shuts life. If it is possible to find the answer out of the equation about a human society, where would it show our society goes to? Today, this problem catches my heart when it considers the terrible change of the environment. But, it seems that it isn't so easy to find out the answer. Or, would it be that only gods and goddesses(or God) know it ?
Introduction.     1: What kind of thing is creature?    2: An Individual and the society.    3: The vector of the change in a society. 5: Evolution and the political powers.    6: Political powers and social norms.    7: The two contradiction lurking to the creature world.   --------------  -------------   --------------  --------------   --------------   --------------  (1. Three logics 2. Biotechnology and creature's logic.) 8, Evolution and a civilization.    9: The logic inherent in civilization and ego.    10: The complementary explanation about the ego.   11: Evolution, information and a thinking.  (1. Information and thinking. 2 Evolution of information related to the evolution theory. 3. Thinking and the cognition-subject. ) As for the 11th knot, it first was written in 2001 year.
Cotosiro Home for English